Purpose: To explore the impact of implementation of a symptom screening and supportive/palliative care referral pathway in patients newly referred to a Canadian gastrointestinal medical oncology clinic.
Methods: Eighty-eight subjects were recruited in each study arm. Intervention subjects were assessed by a member of the supportive/palliative care team if they had a severity score of >3/10 on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System. Controls received normal care, including discretionary referral. Symptom severity was assessed over the subsequent five months. Data on survival, care setting of death (home, hospice or hospital) and long-term resource use were also collected.
Results: Screening led to 141 specialist supportive/palliative care visits in the intervention arm versus only nine in the control arm. There were, however, no subsequent significant differences in symptom severity or the long-term outcomes measured. Many patients identified by the >3/10 severity threshold did not need/want specialist supportive/palliative care referral, and those with severe distress were either identified by the oncology team already or were too unwell or overwhelmed to participate in the study. The specialist service was not overwhelmed. Important considerations on timing and mode of administration of screening tools were revealed.
Conclusion: Routine symptom screening can be burdensome for oncology patients and needs to be as simple as possible. Triaging positive screens is an important role for oncology nurses. Investment in training oncology teams to manage uncomplicated distress in the oncology clinic allows for optimal use of scarce supportive/palliative care specialist resources for patients with complex needs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195821 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5737/23688076334452 | DOI Listing |
Arch Public Health
January 2025
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical-Surgical Nursing Department,, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background: ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) is a model of nurse-led, early palliative care that was originally developed for U.S. patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers and then adapted for patients with heart failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Support Palliat Care
January 2025
Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Objectives: Palliative care phases (stable, unstable, deteriorating, terminal and bereavement) are useful in describing the palliative care situation of patients/relatives and their care needs as well as the suitability of care plans. Little is known about care setting-specific differences of the phases and their association with burden of symptoms/problems and functional status. We aimed to describe the presence and association of symptom/problem burden and functional status with the palliative care phase at the beginning of care episodes in specialist palliative care units, specialist home care teams and advisory services.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Support Palliat Care
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China
Objective: Improper use of human albumin (HA) is now common in clinical settings. This study aims to explore the feasibility of the plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle in promoting the rational use of HA.
Methods: The differences between the control and observation groups (after the PDCA cycle) in terms of serum albumin detection rate, serum albumin values, HA usage, and rationality were analysed and compared using a before-and-after control method.
BMJ Support Palliat Care
January 2025
Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Objectives: The study evaluates the fifth cohort of the palliative care cancer treatment centres (CTC) educational programme in India with the aim of refining the course on the basis of participant feedback thereby improving palliative care services at cancer centres.
Methods: The intervention included participation in the CTC 5 teaching and training programme, which encompassed foundation course, refresher course, access to palliative care training modules, clinical training and mentorship under palliative care experts. The feedback was taken from all 57 participants (29 doctors and 28 nurses) of CTC 5 programme representing 14 hospitals across nine regions in India.
BMC Cancer
January 2025
Department of Supportive and Palliative Care Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Background: Patients need to be supported in combining treatment with daily life. However, measurement of supportive care indicators related to treatment-related side effects is under-reported. This review aimed to identify a list of quality indicators for managing cancer treatment-induced toxicities for adult patients with cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!