AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluated patient engagement in remote symptom monitoring (RSM) programs for cancer, focusing on racial diversity among participants, as previous research showed low representation of racial minorities.
  • Out of 883 patients approached for RSM between May 2021 and May 2023, only 6% declined participation; however, Black patients were over three times more likely to decline compared to White patients, despite similar rates of being approached.
  • The findings suggest that Black patients and those from disadvantaged neighborhoods face challenges in engaging with RSM programs, indicating a need for further investigation to address barriers to equitable participation.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Previous randomized controlled trials have demonstrated benefit from remote symptom monitoring (RSM) with electronic patient-reported outcomes. However, the racial diversity of enrolled patients was low and did not reflect the real-world racial proportions for individuals with cancer.

Methods: This secondary, cross-sectional analysis evaluated engagement of patients with cancer in a RSM program. Patient-reported race was grouped as Black, Other, or White. Patient address was used to map patient residence to determine rurality using Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes and neighborhood disadvantage using Area Deprivation Index. Key outcomes included (1) being approached for RSM enrollment, (2) declining enrollment, (3) adherence with RSM via continuous completion of symptom surveys, and (4) withdrawal from RSM participation. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CI were estimated from modified Poisson models with robust SEs.

Results: Between May 2021 and May 2023, 883 patients were approached to participate, of which 56 (6%) declined RSM. Of those who enrolled in RSM, a total of 27% of patients were Black or African American and 67% were White. In adjusted models, all patient population subgroups of interest had similar likelihoods of being approached for RSM participation; however, Black or African American patients were more than 3× more likely to decline participation than White participants (RR, 3.09 [95% CI, 1.73 to 5.53]). Patients living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods were less likely to decline (RR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.24 to 1.02]), but less likely to adhere to surveys (RR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.97]). All patient populations had a similar likelihood of withdrawing.

Conclusion: Black patients and individuals living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods are at risk for lower engagement in RSM. Further work is needed to identify and overcome barriers to equitable participation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11477859PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00066DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rsm
9
remote symptom
8
symptom monitoring
8
approached rsm
8
rsm participation
8
black african
8
african american
8
living disadvantaged
8
disadvantaged neighborhoods
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!