Objective: To evaluate Medicare reimbursement trends for endocrine surgeries from 2000-23.
Background: As the population ages, demand for endocrine surgeries is expected to increase. Understanding reimbursement trends is essential to ensure the financial sustainability of endocrine surgery.
Methods: Data were extracted from Medicare Inpatient and Outpatient Hospital datasets, National Summary, and Physician Fee Look-up Files for nine common thyroid, parathyroid and adrenal surgeries. Data were adjusted for inflation. Descriptive statistics, compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and linear regression models were built to evaluate practice and reimbursement trends.
Results: From 2000-23, there was a 63.8% increase in endocrine surgery volume. However, inflation-adjusted average procedure reimbursements decreased by 43.2% from $1709 to $972 (CAGR -2.4%), which is the largest decrease for any surgical subspecialty reported in the published literature. At the current CAGR, the average estimated reimbursement is projected to decrease to $868 by 2030 (P<0.001). Average facility reimbursements for inpatient and outpatient hospitalizations increased. However, substantial practice pattern shifts in the study period led to decreased overall facility reimbursements, with a $17.9 million decrease in total inpatient reimbursements between 2016-21 that was only partially offset by a $3.2 million increase in outpatient hospital reimbursements.
Conclusion: Medicare procedure reimbursements for endocrine surgeries have been outpaced by inflation, with large decreases since 2000. Concurrent changes in practice patterns have also resulted in markedly fewer inpatient stays leading to lower total facility reimbursements. Our data raise concern over the financial sustainability of the endocrine surgery field as the demand for endocrine surgery procedures increases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006423 | DOI Listing |
Am J Manag Care
December 2024
Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Auburn University Harrison College of Pharmacy, 4306D Walker Building, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849-5506. Email:
Objectives: This study evaluated the uptake and costs of 3 biosimilars among Medicare and Medicaid populations for 2019 to 2022: rituximab-abbs (Truxima), rituximab-pvvr (Ruxience), and rituximab-arrx (Riabni).
Study Design: A retrospective, descriptive study.
Methods: Using the annually aggregated, product-level utilization and cost data of biologic and biosimilar rituximab products from CMS drug spending data, total claims and costs (reimbursement and out of pocket) for all rituximab products were identified and extracted from Medicare Part B, Medicare Part D, and Medicaid.
Am J Med
December 2024
Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California. Electronic address:
BMC Geriatr
December 2024
Department of Pharmacy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
Background: Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) can lead to adverse outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of PIMs in older Chinese outpatients with heart failure according to the 2019 Beers criteria and the factors associated with PIMs.
Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical data during January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 from 9 tertiary medical institutions in Chengdu, China.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res
December 2024
Milliman (United States).
Rising oncology healthcare costs have led to value-based care reimbursement models that coordinate care and improve quality while reducing overall spending. These models are increasingly important for traditional Medicare and other payers. To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs), AE-associated excess costs, and total cost of care (TCOC) of 3 cohorts receiving first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHealth Econ
December 2024
Department of Economics, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.
For over 3 decades, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has provided a bonus payment for outpatient physician services provided to beneficiaries under Medicare Part B in areas designated as Primary Care Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) during the previous calendar year. Despite the longstanding existence of the program, no studies have explicitly evaluated how previously established physicians practicing in areas subject to an HPSA designation respond to the bonus payments. Using 2012-2019 physician-level data with stacked event study models that control for several characteristics, including the underlying criteria used to construct HPSA scores, I find little to no statistically significant changes in access to care (as measured through total annual beneficiaries treated or services delivered to Medicare beneficiaries) in the years leading up to HPSA designation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!