Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Liver retransplant is the only option to save a patient with liver graft failure. However, it is controversial due to its poor survival outcome compared to primary transplantation. Insufficient deceased organ donation in Taiwan leads to high waitlist mortality. Hence, living-donor grafts offer a valuable alternative for retransplantation. This study aims to analyze the single center's outcome in living donor liver retransplantation (re-LDLT) and deceased donor liver retransplantation (re-DDLT) as well as the survival related confounding risk factors.
Methods: This is a single center retrospective study including 32 adults who underwent liver retransplantation (re-LT) from June 2002 to April 2020. The cohort was divided into a re-LDLT and a re-DDLT group and survival outcomes were analyzed. Patient outcomes over different periods, the effect of timing on survival, and multivariate analysis for risk factors were also demonstrated.
Results: Of the 32 retransplantations, the re-LDLT group (n=11) received grafts from younger donors (31.3 43.75 years, P=0.016), with lower graft weights (688 1,457.2 g, P<0.001) and shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (45 313 min, P<0.001). The 5-year survival was significantly better in the re-LDLT group than in the re-DDLT group (100% 70.8%, P=0.02). This difference was adjusted when only retransplantation after 2010 was analyzed. Further analysis showed that the timing of retransplantation (early late) did not affect patient survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that prolonged warm ischemia time (WIT) and intraoperative blood transfusion were related to poor long-term survival.
Conclusions: Retransplantation with living donor graft demonstrated good long-term outcomes with acceptable complications to both recipient and donor. It may serve as a choice in areas lacking deceased donors. The timing of retransplantation did not affect the long-term survival. Further effort should be made to reduce WIT and massive blood transfusion as they contributed to poor survival after retransplantation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11190508 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-23-178 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!