Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Colonic lymphangiomas are rare and mostly incidental findings found on colonoscopy. It is important to be able to differentiate them from other lesions, such as lipomas. Furthermore, when in close proximity to the appendiceal orifice, such as cecal lesions, they must be differentiated from mucocele and carcinoid tumors. We present a case of a cecal lymphangioma that was managed conservatively. By using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography to better characterize the cecal mass, it was unnecessary to perform a biopsy or polypectomy. This case highlights that biopsy and/or removal of lymphangiomas are not warranted in all cases of colonic lymphangiomas, especially when lesions are less than 2 cm.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189804 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.60808 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!