A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Above and belowground carbon stocks among organic soil wetland types, accounting for peat bathymetry. | LitMetric

Above and belowground carbon stocks among organic soil wetland types, accounting for peat bathymetry.

Sci Total Environ

Département des sciences naturelles, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada; Institut des sciences de la forêt tempérée (ISFORT), Ripon, QC, Canada.

Published: October 2024

Wetlands are widely recognized for their carbon (C) sequestration capacity and importance at mitigating climate change. Yet, to best inform regional conservation planning, the variability of C stocks among wetland types and between above and belowground compartments requires further investigation. Additionally, the bathymetry of peat basins has often been ignored, with soil C stock calculations mostly relying on the thickest peat section, potentially leading to overestimates. Here, we sampled vegetation and soil of 57 wetlands of southeastern Canada to characterize the variability of above and belowground organic C stocks among four wetland types: open bogs, open fens, swamps, and forested peatlands. We also compared carbon stock estimation approaches considering peat bathymetry or not. Results showed that peat thickness, and thus soil organic C (SOC), varied substantially within sites due to peat basin shapes. Omitting bathymetry led to site-scale SOC overestimates of about 20-38 % on average, depending on the approach used, with wide variability among sites (overestimates up to 200 %). Belowground C stocks varied among wetland types with mean values of 132, 101, 19, and 44 kg C m for bogs, fens, swamps, and forested peatlands, respectively. Aboveground C was nearly zero in open bogs and fens but reached ∼30 % of total C stock in swamps and ∼ 15 % in forested peatlands. C stocks in tree roots and shrubs were negligible. Despite the lower C density (per m) of swamps and forested peatlands, these ecosystems represented the dominant C stocks at the regional scale due to their abundance in the landscape. Overall, the four wetland types stored an estimated 2-7 times more C than forest per unit area. Evaluating differences in C stocks according to wetland type, while integrating peat bathymetry in calculations, can significantly improve regional wetland conservation planning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174177DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wetland types
20
forested peatlands
16
peat bathymetry
12
stocks wetland
12
swamps forested
12
conservation planning
8
bathymetry peat
8
open bogs
8
fens swamps
8
bogs fens
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!