Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Ammonia nitrogen (AN) pollution frequently occurs in urban rivers with the continuous acceleration of industrialization. Monitoring AN pollution levels and tracing its complex sources often require large-scale testing, which are time-consuming and costly. Due to the lack of reliable data samples, there were few studies investigating the feasibility of water quality prediction of AN concentration with a high fluctuation and non-stationary change through data-driven models. In this study, four deep-learning models based on neural network algorithms including artificial neural network (ANN), recurrent neural network (RNN), long short-term memory (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit (GRU) were employed to predict AN concentration through some easily monitored indicators such as pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity, in a real AN-polluted river. The results showed that the GRU model achieved optimal prediction performance with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.349 and coefficient of determination (R) of 0.792. Furthermore, it was found that data preprocessing by the VMD technique improved the prediction accuracy of the GRU model, resulting in an R value of 0.822. The prediction model effectively detected and warned against abnormal AN pollution (> 2 mg/L), with a Recall rate of 93.6% and Precision rate of 72.4%. This data-driven method enables reliable monitoring of AN concentration with high-frequency fluctuations and has potential applications for urban river pollution management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44211-024-00622-7 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!