Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Knowledge of the expected accuracy of HLA typing algorithms is important when choosing between algorithms and when evaluating the HLA typing predictions of an algorithm. This chapter guides the reader through an example benchmarking study that evaluates the performances of four NGS-based HLA typing algorithms as well as outlining factors to consider, when designing and running such a benchmarking study. The code related to this benchmarking workflow can be found at https://github.com/nikolasthuesen/springers-hla-benchmark/ .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3874-3_6 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!