A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A lower eGFR/eGFR ratio is associated with greater cardiovascular risk (higher Framingham Risk Score) in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. | LitMetric

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Shrunken pore syndrome (SPS) is defined as eGFR/eGFR ratio <0.70 and predicts high CVD mortality. The Framingham Risk Score (FRS) is used to estimate an individual's 10-year CVD risk. This study investigated the association between FRS and eGFR/eGFR ratio in T2DM patients.

Methods: Patients aged 18-80 years who were newly diagnosed with T2DM were included in this retrospective study. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association between risk factors of T2DM and FRS. A Generalized Linear Model was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: There were 270 patients included in the study. Only 27 patients (10%) met the diagnostic criteria of SPS. Ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that SPS was not correlated with FRS risk (OR = 1.99, 95%CI = 0.94-4.23,  = 0.07), whereas eGFR/eGFR (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.77-0.97,  = 0.01) showed a significant negative association with FRS risk. Compared with eGFR/eGFR>0.85, eGFR/eGFR≤0.85 increased FRS risk (OR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.18-3.21,  < 0.01). After adjustment for confounding factors, increased eGFR/eGFR ratio was associated with decreased FRS risk when considered as a continuous variable (OR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.77-0.99,  = 0.03). The FRS risk in patients with eGFR/eGFR≤0.85 is 1.86 times higher than that in patients with eGFR/eGFR>0.85 (OR = 1.86, 95%CI = 1.08-3.21,  = 0.03).

Conclusions: In the current study, no significant association between SPS and FRS was identified. However, lower eGFR/eGFR and eGFR/eGFR≤0.85 were associated with a significantly increased CVD risk in T2DM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195453PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2346267DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

egfr/egfr ratio
8
type diabetes
8
diabetes mellitus
8
lower egfr/egfr
4
ratio associated
4
associated greater
4
greater cardiovascular
4
cardiovascular risk
4
risk higher
4
higher framingham
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!