The Shoulder Instability-Return to Sports After Injury (SIRSI) scale is a useful psychological readiness tool to determine whether athletes are prepared to return to sport. Although questions remain on the optimal timing of survey administration based on the type of procedure (i.e., arthroscopic Bankart repair vs Latarjet procedure) and external factors contributing to psychological readiness, its current use begs the question of what other applications may be appropriate. The SIRSI scale has recently been able to effectively predict patient-reported and clinical outcomes, such as postoperative instability recurrence. However, it also may have added value as a serial screening tool for determining a safe return to preinjury activity rather than just serving as a harbinger of further negative outcomes after shoulder stabilization. Increasingly, we must recognize the fundamental limitations in our current rehabilitation pathways and sometimes myopic, 1-dimensional return-to-play criteria (e.g., range of motion or isokinetic testing) in facilitating a safe return to competition. We must transition to a more regimented, criteria-based return-to-play battery that incorporates optimized psychological readiness. As such, the SIRSI scale, like its anterior cruciate ligament counterpart, could become the standard of care in determining confidence in returning to sport and ultimately serve as a benchmark of surgical success.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.06.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

psychological readiness
16
sirsi scale
12
shoulder instability-return
8
instability-return sports
8
sports injury
8
scale psychological
8
safe return
8
editorial commentary
4
commentary shoulder
4
scale
4

Similar Publications

Objective: Despite excellent functional outcomes after shoulder stabilization surgery, a substantial number of patients fail to return to sports (RTS) at the preinjury level. The psychological factors affecting RTS postsurgery have been underexplored. This scoping review aimed to identify and analyze potential psychological factors influencing the decision to RTS after shoulder stabilization surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe labor and delivery nurses' experiences in caring for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We used a descriptive phenomenological design and purposeful sampling to recruit experienced labor and delivery nurses for flexible semi-structured face-to-face audiotaped interviews. Constant comparison was used to analyze data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A diverse body of research conducted since the start of Covid-19 has investigated the impact of the pandemic on children's environments and their language development. This scoping review synthesises the peer-reviewed research literature on this topic between 2020 and 2023. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews, we searched five databases for studies that fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: studies with neurotypical (monolingual or multilingual) 0-6-year-old children; studies focusing on any area of language development, including sources describing literacy or educational practices that impacted language development; studies focusing in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no restrictions of geographical location or language used by participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The psychological resilience of university students majoring in long-term-care (LTC)-related disciplines is crucial for workforce retention and effective care provision in this field. This study aims to investigate the differences in levels of psychological resilience among these students in Taiwan.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 258 participants selected via stratified random sampling from 23 universities across Taiwan from November 2021 to November 2022, representing a diverse educational context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To examine sex differences in psychological readiness to return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction as well as to determine whether males and females separately fulfilled cut-off values (≥65) of psychological readiness necessary to return to sport.

Information Sources: Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed were comprehensively searched from inception to January 2024 to identify relevant studies.

Eligibility Criteria: Observational investigations that compared males and females with a history of ACL reconstruction concerning psychological readiness to return to sport.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!