AI Article Synopsis

  • The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) is tailored for ALS patients, making it more suitable for assessing cognitive impairments compared to the more commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
  • A study involving 84 ALS patients showed that while both tests identified a similar prevalence of cognitive impairment (22.7%), they agreed only 52.9% of the time.
  • The findings indicate that although the MMSE isn't ideal for early-stage ALS cognitive screening, it can still offer rough estimates compared to ECAS scores, with ECAS providing better discrimination in identifying lower levels of cognitive dysfunction.

Article Abstract

Objective: The Edinburgh Cognitive and Behavioural ALS Screen (ECAS) is an established cognitive screening instrument for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Different from tools like the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), it is adjusted for motor impairment, yet, the latter remains one of the most widely used screening instruments, also in ALS studies. Thus, it is of utmost importance to relate outcome scores of both instruments to allow for comparison in ALS patients. This study reports on the performance of ALS patients in both tests with regard to incidence and degree of cognitive impairment, and the correspondence of both, ECAS and MMSE scores.

Methods: We examined N = 84 ALS patients with the German versions of the ECAS and the MMSE. Performance in both tests regarding incidence and degree of cognitive impairment, and correspondence of frequency of cognitive impairment according to both tests was examined. The relationship between ECAS and MMSE scores was modelled with a non-linear regression model.

Results: All ALS patients were able to complete the ECAS, 89.3% (N = 75) were capable to complete the MMSE. Prevalence of cognitive impairment was in both tests 22.7%, however agreement was only 52.9%. Despite, regression analyses yielded a strong positive relationship (adjusted R2 = .68) between the ECAS total score and the MMSE total score. Both tests were able to identify all patients with dementia.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the MMSE is not ideal for cognitive screening in early-stage ALS patients. However, a rough translation of MMSE scores in ECAS scores is possible to estimate the cognitive performance level of patients, with the ECAS being more discriminative in the lower range of cognitive dysfunction (ECAS score: 80-136), for which the MMSE does not define cognitive impairment (corresponding MMSE score: 27-30).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189171PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304593PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

als patients
20
cognitive impairment
20
ecas mmse
12
cognitive
11
mmse
10
als
9
ecas
9
screening instruments
8
mini-mental state
8
state examination
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!