A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Unveiling the causal link between metabolic factors and ovarian cancer risk using Mendelian randomization analysis. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Metabolic abnormalities are connected to ovarian cancer (OC), but the link between body measurements and OC risk remains inconsistent.
  • The study utilized a Mendelian randomization approach, analyzing data from genome-wide association studies to explore causal relationships between metabolic factors and OC risk, employing various statistical methods for accuracy.
  • Results indicated that 10 metabolic factors, including basal metabolic rate and body fat percentage, are causally associated with an increased risk of OC, highlighting the impact of fat accumulation and distribution on cancer risk.

Article Abstract

Background: Metabolic abnormalities are closely tied to the development of ovarian cancer (OC), yet the relationship between anthropometric indicators as risk indicators for metabolic abnormalities and OC lacks consistency.

Method: The Mendelian randomization (MR) approach is a widely used methodology for determining causal relationships. Our study employed summary statistics from the genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and we used inverse variance weighting (IVW) together with MR-Egger and weighted median (WM) supplementary analyses to assess causal relationships between exposure and outcome. Furthermore, additional sensitivity studies, such as leave-one-out analyses and MR-PRESSO were used to assess the stability of the associations.

Result: The IVW findings demonstrated a causal associations between 10 metabolic factors and an increased risk of OC. Including "Basal metabolic rate" (OR= 1.24, = 6.86×10); "Body fat percentage" (OR= 1.22, = 8.20×10); "Hip circumference" (OR= 1.20, = 5.92×10); "Trunk fat mass" (OR= 1.15, = 1.03×10); "Trunk fat percentage" (OR= 1.25, = 8.55×10); "Waist circumference" (OR= 1.23, = 3.28×10); "Weight" (OR= 1.21, = 9.82×10); "Whole body fat mass" (OR= 1.21, = 4.90×10); "Whole body fat-free mass" (OR= 1.19, = 4.11×10) and "Whole body water mass" (OR= 1.21, = 1.85×10).

Conclusion: Several metabolic markers linked to altered fat accumulation and distribution are significantly associated with an increased risk of OC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11185996PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1401648DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mass" or=
16
or= 121
12
"whole body
12
or=
10
metabolic factors
8
ovarian cancer
8
mendelian randomization
8
metabolic abnormalities
8
causal relationships
8
increased risk
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!