AI Article Synopsis
- The article reviews the use of immobilization during fluoroscopy in infants, highlighting its pros like improved imaging and reduced movement, alongside cons such as parental concerns and ethical issues around consent.
- It compares varying institutional policies on immobilization, noting the divide between those who support routine use and those who question its necessity based on ethical considerations.
- The authors argue for a balanced approach that values patient-centered care while emphasizing the need for institutional guidelines that ensure both safety and ethical integrity in pediatric radiology.
Article Abstract
This article explores the practice of immobilization during fluoroscopy procedures for infants, discussing its advantages and disadvantages. The authors examine contrasting policies and thoughts on immobilization across different medical institutions. While some advocate for its routine use to minimize patient motion, enhance imaging quality, and decrease radiation exposure, others question its necessity and raise concerns about patient consent and parental distress. Ethical dilemmas are also discussed regarding patient autonomy and psychological impact on families. The authors advocate for a balanced approach, recognizing the utility of immobilization in certain clinical scenarios while still emphasizing patient-centered care. Ultimately, the article underscores the importance of institutional policies that prioritize both patient safety and ethical principles in pediatric radiology practices.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110223 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!