Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of many cancers, including melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Randomised trials are evaluating outcomes from reduced ICI treatment schedules with the aim of improving quality of life, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to provide insight into patient and carer's perspectives of these trials.

Methods: Seven focus groups were conducted with 31 people with stage IV melanoma, RCC, or caregivers for people receiving ICI. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were generated: 1) "Treatment and clinic visits provide reassurance": reducing hospital visits may not improve quality of life. 2) "Assessment of personal risk versus benefit": the decision to participate in an ICI optimisation trial is influenced by treatment response, experience of toxicity and perceived logistical benefits based on the individual's circumstances. 3) "Pre-existing experience and beliefs about how treatment and trials work", including the belief that more treatment is better, influence views around ICI optimisation trials.

Conclusion: This study provides insight into recruitment challenges and recommends strategies to enhance recruitment for ongoing ICI optimisation trials. These findings will influence the design of future ICI optimisation trials ensuring they are acceptable to patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616340PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02756-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ici optimisation
16
immune checkpoint
8
quality life
8
optimisation trials
8
ici
6
optimisation
5
treatment
5
hit hard
4
hard qualitative
4
qualitative patient
4

Similar Publications

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised the treatment landscape for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has demonstrated efficacy, establishing a new standard of care for advanced HCC. Neoadjuvant studies have shown promising results with high response rates, increasing research into ICIs' role.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of cancer deaths, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are key treatments, but not all patients benefit from them, highlighting the need for predictive biomarkers.
  • Researchers developed a deep learning model (ResNet18-PG) using histopathology images from NSCLC patients to create an ICI-related pathological prognostic signature (ir-PPS) aimed at identifying patient prognosis and treatment response.
  • The model showed strong predictive capability with an AUC of 0.918 and identified low-risk patients who had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) compared to high-risk patients, demonstrating its potential in optimizing ICI treatment selection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An overview of immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicities in bladder cancer.

Toxicol Rep

December 2024

Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK.

Bladder cancer is the tenth most prevalent malignancy worldwide, with a significant mortality burden. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common histological subtype, and treatment options are guided by whether the disease is muscle-invasive (MIBC) or non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC), with subsequent risk group stratification. The growing popularity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to treat MIBC and NMIBC as either monotherapy or combined with intravesical agents, may radically change the treatment paradigm of UC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of many cancers, including melanoma and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Randomised trials are evaluating outcomes from reduced ICI treatment schedules with the aim of improving quality of life, tolerability, and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to provide insight into patient and carer's perspectives of these trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Optimisation with Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Solid Tumours: A Systematic Review.

Cancers (Basel)

February 2024

CIRFF-Centre of Pharmacoeconomics and Drug Utilization Research, Department of Pharmacy, University of Naples Federico II, via D Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy.

This study investigated the health economic evaluations of predictive biomarker testing in solid tumours treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from June 2010 to February 2022, 58 relevant articles were reviewed out of the 730 screened. The focus was predominantly on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (65%) and other solid tumours (40%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!