AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of intravenous albumin infusions in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) who were not responding to standard steroids.
  • The trial involved 61 patients, who were divided into two groups: one receiving albumin with standard care and exclusive enteral nutrition, and the other receiving only standard care and nutrition.
  • Results showed no significant difference in steroid response, need for colectomy, or adverse events between the two groups, indicating that albumin infusion did not provide additional benefits for ASUC patients.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Overall, 30-40% patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis [ASUC] fail intravenous [IV] steroids, requiring medical rescue therapy/colectomy. Low baseline albumin predicts steroid non-response, and exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN] has been shown to improve steroid response and albumin levels. Albumin infusion, due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, might further improve steroid response in ASUC, which was evaluated in the present study.

Methods: In this open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with ASUC were randomised in 1:1 ratio to either albumin + standard of care [SOC] + EEN [Albumin arm] or SOC + EEN [SOC arm], over January 2021-February 2023. Both arms received 5 days of EEN with 400 mg IV hydrocortisone/day. Patients in the Albumin arm were administered 5 days of 20% weight/volume [w/v] intravenous albumin [100 ml]. Primary outcome was first, steroid failure [need for rescue medical therapy or colectomy] and second, proportion of patients with adverse events.

Results: In all, 61 patients [albumin: 30, SOC: 31][mean age 31.6 ± 0.4 years, male 57.4%], were included. Baseline characteristics were comparable. There was no difference in steroid failure between Albumin and SOC arms (10/30 [33.33%] vs 13/31[41.94%], p = 0.49). No adverse events were reported with albumin infusions. Colectomy rate [10% vs 9.68%, p = 1], response to salvage medical therapy [88.89% vs 76.92%, p = 0.62] and median [interquartile range] duration of hospitalisation [10.5 [7-16] vs 10 [7-20], p = 0.43] were also comparable. The long-term composite outcome of colectomy and re-admission rates was numerically higher in the Albumin than the SOC arm [37.04% vs 17.86%, p > 0.05], although this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: There was no benefit of intravenous albumin infusion as an adjunct to IV steroids and EEN in patients with ASUC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intravenous albumin
12
albumin infusion
12
albumin
9
exclusive enteral
8
enteral nutrition
8
acute severe
8
severe ulcerative
8
ulcerative colitis
8
randomised controlled
8
controlled trial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!