Interplay Between the American Diabetes Association's ABC Targets for Diabetes, Insulin Resistance Indices, and Dyslipidemia in Indian Type 2 Diabetes Patients.

Background The increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in India underscores the pressing need for effective management strategies. Meeting the American Diabetes Association (ADA) ABC targets for diabetes (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), blood pressure, and serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)) is crucial for effectively managing T2D, as it reflects the optimal control of key metabolic parameters. Insulin resistance (IR) and impaired beta cell function (BCF) have been found to have a significant impact on glycemic control, lipid metabolism, and hypertension, contributing to the complex cardiovascular risk profile of patients with T2D. This study aimed to explore the association between ABC targets for diabetes, IR, BCF, and dyslipidemia in a cross-sectional cohort of T2D patients. Methods This retrospective study examined data from 681 T2D patients with comorbid hypertension and dyslipidemia. The patients were part of a one-year online lifestyle intervention program for diabetes management at the Freedom from Diabetes Clinic in Pune, India, between January 2021 and December 2022. Baseline data (at the time of enrollment in the program) on medical history and anthropometric and biochemical parameters were retrospectively extracted from medical records and used to assess ABC targets and other clinical parameters. The ABC targets for diabetes include three goals: an HbA1c level of less than 7.0%, a blood pressure level of less than 140/90 mmHg, and an LDL-C level of less than 100 mg/dL. Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta Cell Function (HOMA-B), and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI) were calculated using standard formulas. Results Cross-sectional analysis at baseline showed that 152 (22.3%) participants met all three ABC targets, 306 (45.0%) and 183 (26.8%) participants met two or one targets, respectively, and 40 (5.9%) did not meet any of the ABC targets. Participants meeting all three targets showed significantly lower IR, higher sensitivity (HOMA-IR, median 2.1; QUICKI, median 0.34), higher BCF (HOMA-B, median 62.9), and healthier lipid profiles (mg/dL) (total cholesterol, median 126; triglycerides, median 114; and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL), median 84) than those who did not meet any of the ABC targets (HOMA-IR, median 3.4; QUICKI, median 0.31; HOMA-B, median 31.7; total cholesterol, median 221; triglycerides, median 187; and non-HDL, median 182) (p < 0.01). A significant association was observed between lower BMI (< 25 kg/m), lower IR (HOMA-IR <2.5), and meeting all three ABC targets (p < 0.01). No significant association was observed between the duration of diabetes and ABC target status (p > 0.1). Lower IR was identified as a predictor of achievement of all three ABC targets (p < 0.01). Conclusion This study highlights the significance of meeting ABC targets for diabetes in relation to not only a better lipid profile but also lower IR and higher BCF. These preliminary findings provide novel insights into the interplay between IR, BCF, dyslipidemia, and meeting ABC targets in an Indian T2D population. These findings highlight the need for effective diabetes management strategies and improved patient outcomes, considering factors such as BMI and IR indices.