Building a cardiogenic shock response team: key considerations necessary to improve outcomes.

Curr Opin Crit Care

The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center.

Published: August 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The review discusses the formation of cardiogenic shock (CS) teams, highlighting evidence and recommendations for establishing effective programs to improve patient outcomes.
  • - CS has a high in-hospital mortality rate (30%-70%) due to various causes, late recognition of the condition, and delays in treatment, making specialized teams crucial.
  • - CS teams, made up of experts in critical care and cardiology, facilitate quicker identification of CS and promote coordinated, effective patient management for better results.

Article Abstract

Purpose Of Review: This review provides key information about cardiogenic shock (CS) teams, including published evidence and practical recommendations to create a CS team and program.

Recent Findings: CS is a complex disease process with a high in-hospital mortality rate ranging from 30% to 70% according to recent registries and randomized studies. The explanation for the elevated rates is likely multifactorial, including the various etiologies of cardiogenic shock as well as delays in recognition and deployment of appropriate therapies. Accordingly, the use of cardiogenic shock team has been implemented with the aim of improving outcomes in these patients. The CS team typically consists of members with critical care or cardiac critical care expertise, heart failure, cardiothoracic surgery, and interventional cardiology. A number of retrospective studies have now supported the benefits of a CS team, particularly in selecting the appropriate candidates for tailored mechanical circulatory support therapies and providing interventions in a timely manner, which have translated into improved outcomes.

Summary: CS teams provides a platform for expedited recognition of CS and timely, standardized, and multidisciplinary discussions regarding appropriate management and care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000001177DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiogenic shock
16
critical care
8
team
5
building cardiogenic
4
shock
4
shock response
4
response team
4
team key
4
key considerations
4
considerations improve
4

Similar Publications

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains one of the most common causes for cardiogenic shock (CS), with high inpatient mortality (40-50 %). Studies have reported the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in decompensated heart failure, but contemporary data on their use to guide management of AMI-CS and in different SCAI stages of CS are lacking. We investigated the association of PACs and clinical outcomes in AMI-CS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is marked by substantial morbidity and mortality. The two major CS etiologies include heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The utilization trends of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and their clinical outcomes are not well described.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Spontaneous regression in breast cancer is rare but can dramatically improve patient prognosis. Although the underlying mechanism is unknown, it may be due to a biological response to external invasion. An 81-year-old woman presented to our emergency department with a 600x100mm large breast mass.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is recognized as newly-acquired bilateral muscle weakness, which is a complication of critical illness in the ICU; however, there are no reports on the pathogenesis and early predictors of ICU-AW specifically associated with cardiogenic shock (CS). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of ICU-AW in patients with CS requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS). This study was a single-center, prospective, and observational study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The concomitant use of IMPELLA and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) (ECPELLA) has been increasingly used to treat severe cardiogenic shock. However, the relationship between severity of heart failure on admission and prognosis based on differences in the mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is not fully understood. This study evaluated the association between lactate levels on admission and clinical outcomes based on differences in MCS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!