AI Article Synopsis

  • The rapid growth of urbanization and industrialization has led to increased emissions of harmful substances into the atmosphere.
  • Traditional methods to evaluate titanium dioxide (TiO) photocatalytic degradation are complex and resource-heavy, making machine learning (ML) a useful tool for estimation.
  • This study utilizes thirteen ML techniques, finding that models like XG Boost (XGB), Decision Tree (DT), and Lasso Regression (LR2) show high accuracy and low error rates in predicting TiO degradation rates, indicating their effectiveness in addressing air contamination.

Article Abstract

The escalation of global urbanization and industrial expansion has resulted in an increase in the emission of harmful substances into the atmosphere. Evaluating the effectiveness of titanium dioxide (TiO) in photocatalytic degradation through traditional methods is resource-intensive and complex due to the detailed photocatalyst structures and the wide range of contaminants. Therefore in this study, recent advancements in machine learning (ML) are used to offer data-driven approach using thirteen machine learning techniques namely XG Boost (XGB), decision tree (DT), lasso Regression (LR2), support vector regression (SVR), adaBoost (AB), voting Regressor (VR), CatBoost (CB), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), gradient boost (GB), random Forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), ridge regression (RR), linear regression (LR1) to address the problem of estimation of TiO photocatalytic degradation rate of air contaminants. The models are developed using literature data and different methodical tools are used to evaluate the developed ML models. XGB, DT and LR2 models have high R values of 0.93, 0.926 and 0.926 in training and 0.936, 0.924 and 0.924 in test phase. While ANN, RR and LR models have lowest R values of 0.70, 0.56 and 0.40 in training and 0.62, 0.63 and 0.31 in test phase respectively. XGB, DT and LR2 have low MAE and RMSE values of 0.450 min/cm, 0.494 min/cm and 0.49 min/cm for RMSE and 0.263 min/cm, 0.285 min/cm and 0.29 min/cm for MAE in test stage. XGB, DT, and LR2 have 93% percent errors within 20% error range in training phase. XGB has 92% and DT, and LR2 have 94% errors with 20% range in test phase. XGB, DT, LR2 models remained the highest performing models and XGB is the most robust and effective in predictions. Feature importances reveal the role of input parameters in prediction made by developed ML models. Dosage, humidity, UV light intensity remain important experimental factors. This study will impact positively in providing efficient models to estimate photocatalytic degradation rate of air contaminants using TiO.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11176179PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64486-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

photocatalytic degradation
16
xgb lr2
16
machine learning
12
tio photocatalytic
12
air contaminants
12
test phase
12
phase xgb
12
models
9
degradation rate
8
rate air
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!