Tumor microenvironment characteristics of lipid metabolism reprogramming related to ferroptosis and EndMT influencing prognosis in gastric cancer.

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a refractory malignant tumor with high tumor heterogeneity, a low rate of early diagnosis, and poor patient prognosis. Lipid metabolism reprogramming plays a critical role in tumorigenesis and progression, but its prognostic role and regulatory mechanism in GC are rarely studied. Thus, the identification of signatures related to lipid metabolism is necessary and may present a new avenue for improving the overall prognosis of GC.

Methods: Lipid metabolism-associated genes (LMAGs) with differential expression in tumor and tumor-adjacent tissue were acquired to identify lipid metabolism-associated subtypes. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the two clusters were then utilized for prognostic analysis and signature construction. Additionally, pathway enrichment analysis and immune cell infiltration analysis were employed to identify the characteristics of the prognostic model. Further analyses were conducted at the single-cell level to better understand the model's prognostic mechanism. Finally, the prediction of immunotherapy response was used to suggest potential treatments.

Results: Two lipid metabolism-associated subtypes were identified and 9 prognosis-related genes from the DEGs between the two clusters were collected for the construction of the prognostic model named lipid metabolism-associated signature (LMAS). Then we found the low LMAS patients with favorable prognoses were more sensitive to ferroptosis in the Cancer Genome Atlas of Stomach Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-STAD). Meanwhile, the tumor cells exhibiting high levels of lipid peroxidation and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in single-cell levels were primarily enriched in the low LMAS group, which was more likely to induce ferroptosis. In addition, endothelial cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) facilitated tumor angiogenesis, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis through endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT), affecting the prognosis of the patients with high LMAS scores. Moreover, CD1C CD141 dendritic cells (DCs) also secreted pro-tumorigenic cytokines to regulate the function of endothelial cells and CAFs. Finally, the patients with low LMAS scores might have better efficacy in immunotherapy.

Conclusions: A LMAS was constructed to guide GC prognosis and therapy. Meanwhile, a novel anti-tumor effect was found in lipid metabolism reprogramming of GC which improved patients' prognosis by regulating the sensitivity of tumor cells to ferroptosis. Moreover, EndMT may have a negative impact on GC prognosis.