Emergency Medical Services and Public Health Perspectives on Alternative Emergency Response Models.

Alison K Miller Christopher B Gage Matthew Parrish Isaac Toliver Alexander Ulintz Jonathan Powell Jennifer A Frey Ashish R Panchal

J Public Health Manag Pract

Author Affiliations: Neurological Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA (Ms Miller); National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians, Columbus, Ohio, USA (Messrs Gage, Powell, and Panchal); Division of Epidemiology, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, USA (Messrs Gage and Panchal); The City of Columbus Division of Fire, Columbus, Ohio, USA (Messrs Parrish and Toliver); and Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA (Mr Ulintz, Ms Frey, and Mr Panchal).

Published: June 2024

A study was conducted to explore the perspectives of first responders and public health workers on emergency response roles and the need for interdisciplinary partnerships in a midwestern U.S. county.
The survey found that 97% of EMS clinicians believe they play a role in immediate responses to emergencies, while only 42% of public health workers agree; additionally, a significant majority supports the idea of multidisciplinary models despite concerns about adequate resources.
The results highlighted differing perceptions among EMS and public health workers regarding their roles in various emergencies, signaling a potential for improved collaboration and effectiveness in emergency response if new models are embraced.

Context: New approaches to emergency response are a national focus due to evolving needs and growing demands on the system, but perspectives of first responders and potential partners have not been evaluated.

Objective: This project aimed to inform the development and implementation of alternative emergency response models, including interdisciplinary partnerships, by identifying the perspectives of the frontline workforce regarding their evolving roles.

Design: An electronic survey was sent, querying respondents about their perceived roles in emergency response, interdisciplinary partnerships, and resources needed.

Setting: This study took place in a metropolitan, midwestern county with participants from 2 public health agencies and 1 emergency medical services (EMS) agency.

Participants: The survey was completed by 945 EMS clinicians and 58 public health workers.

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were agreement levels on each group's roles in prevention, response, and recovery after emergencies, as well as general feedback on new models.

Results: Overall, 97% of EMS clinicians and 42% of public health workers agreed that they have a role in immediate response to 9-1-1 emergencies. In mental health emergencies, 87% of EMS clinicians and 52% of public health workers agreed that they have a role, compared to 87% and 30%, respectively, in violent emergencies. Also, 84% of respondents felt multidisciplinary models are a needed change. However, 35% of respondents felt their agency has the resources necessary for changes.

Conclusions: We observed differences between EMS clinicians and public health workers in their perceived roles during emergency response and beliefs about the types of emergencies within their scope. There is strong support for alternative approaches and a perception that this model may improve personal well-being and job satisfaction, but a need for additional resources to develop and implement.

Download full-text PDF	Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001969	DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public health

emergency response

ems clinicians

health workers

emergency medical

medical services

alternative emergency

response models

interdisciplinary partnerships

perceived roles

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!