A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparing the accuracy of four machine learning models in predicting type 2 diabetes onset within the Chinese population: a retrospective study. | LitMetric

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) models in predicting 5-year type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk within the Chinese population by retrospectively analyzing annual health checkup records.

Methods: We included 46,247 patients (32,372 and 13,875 in training and validation sets, respectively) from a national health checkup center database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify factors influencing T2DM risk. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) models were trained to predict 5-year T2DM risk. Model performances were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for discrimination and calibration plots for prediction accuracy.

Results: Key variables included fasting plasma glucose, age, and sedentary time. The LR model showed good accuracy with respective areas under the ROC (AUCs) of 0.914 and 0.913 in training and validation sets; the RF model exhibited favorable AUCs of 0.998 and 0.838. In calibration analysis, the LR model displayed good fit for low-risk patients; the RF model exhibited satisfactory fit for low- and high-risk patients.

Conclusions: LR and RF models can effectively predict T2DM risk in the Chinese population. These models may help identify high-risk patients and guide interventions to prevent complications and disabilities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11179491PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605241253786DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

t2dm risk
16
chinese population
12
machine learning
8
learning models
8
models predicting
8
type diabetes
8
risk chinese
8
health checkup
8
training validation
8
validation sets
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!