The development of pragmatic competence is crucial for enhancing learners' ability to communicate more effectively in English in various cultural and social contexts. Numerous studies have explored the impact of implicit and/or explicit training on language learners' pragmatic development. However, the scarcity of online pragmatic training has motivated this research. To this end, a randomized experimental study was conducted to determine whether online pragmatic treatment could enhance students' pragmatic competence and to identify which procedure, explicit or implicit, is more effective. Sixty university students were randomly assigned to three groups of 20: two experimental groups (implicit and explicit) and one control group. 'Google Meet' was used for online training. All three groups were given a Discourse Completion Task (DCT) as a pre-test featuring 12 different scenarios, three for each of four speech acts. At the end of the treatment, the participants of the experimental and control groups received the same DCT as a post-test. The findings revealed that the participants of the experimental groups improved their pragmatic competence compared to the pre-test and post-test results of the control group. Although there is a difference between the implicit and explicit groups' post-test results, the difference is not statistically significant. Still, according to Cohen's d effect size, the effect size of the explicit group (1.5) is larger than that of the implicit group (1.1). According to the results of the study, it can be said that pragmatic training contributes to the effective use of the target language for communicative purposes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11167303PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31763DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

online pragmatic
12
pragmatic training
12
pragmatic competence
12
pragmatic
8
speech acts
8
three groups
8
experimental groups
8
implicit explicit
8
control group
8
participants experimental
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Cocreation, a collaborative process of key interested partners working alongside researchers, is fundamental to community-engaged research. However, the field of community-engaged research is currently grappling with a significant gap: the lack of a pragmatic and validated measure to assess the quality of this process. This protocol addresses this significant gap by developing and testing a pragmatic cocreation measure with diverse community and research partners involved in participatory health-related research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Unhealthy alcohol use is a leading cause of preventable mortality and a risk factor for an array of social and health problems. The Intervention in Small primary care Practices to Implement Reduction in unhealthy alcohol use (INSPIRE) study is part of a nationwide campaign to improve the identification and treatment of patients engaging in unhealthy alcohol use.

Methods: We conducted a single arm, pragmatic study consisting of seventeen primary care practices in the Chicago metropolitan area, Wisconsin, and California across two waves with a 6-month latent period, a 12-month intervention period, followed by a 6-month sustainability period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The financial and resource burden of management of olecranon fractures in the elderly is likely to increase with an aging population. There is limited evidence guiding treatment choice in this cohort. This study aimed to determine whether operative treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in elderly patients provides superior 12-month functional outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the efficacy of an intervention remain underutilized in community-based environmental health research. RCTs that use a pragmatic design emphasize the effectiveness of interventions in complex, real world settings. Pragmatic trials may be especially relevant when community-based interventions address social and environmental determinants that threaten health equity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The present study aims to fill the research gap by evaluating published empirical studies and answering the specific research question: Can individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) predict upcoming linguistic information during real-time language comprehension? Following the PRISMA framework, an initial search via PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar yielded a total of 697 records. After screening the abstract and full text, 10 studies, covering 350 children and adolescents with ASD ranging from 2 to 15 years old, were included for analysis. We found that individuals with ASD may predict the upcoming linguistic information by using verb semantics but not pragmatic prosody during language comprehension.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!