AI Article Synopsis

  • - The TIM-HF2 study showed that remote patient management (RPM) significantly reduces the number of days lost due to hospital admissions or death in heart failure (HF) patients, particularly those with diabetes, with hazard ratios indicating improved outcomes.
  • - In a follow-up analysis including 707 HF patients with diabetes, RPM led to a notable decrease in unplanned cardiovascular hospitalizations and all-cause mortality compared to usual care, along with enhanced quality of life as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
  • - Overall, the findings support implementing RPM for heart failure patients with diabetes to improve health outcomes and quality of life, indicating its effectiveness in a specific high-risk population.

Article Abstract

Background: The TIM-HF2 study demonstrated that remote patient management (RPM) in a well-defined heart failure (HF) population reduced the percentage of days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospital admissions or all-cause death during 1-year follow-up (hazard ratio 0.80) and all-cause mortality alone (HR 0.70). Higher rates of hospital admissions and mortality have been reported in HF patients with diabetes compared with HF patients without diabetes. Therefore, in a post-hoc analysis of the TIM-HF2 study, we investigated the efficacy of RPM in HF patients with diabetes.

Methods: TIM-HF2 study was a randomized, controlled, unmasked (concealed randomization), multicentre trial, performed in Germany between August 2013 and May 2018. HF-Patients in NYHA class II/III who had a HF-related hospital admission within the previous 12 months, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction, and were randomized to usual care with or without added RPM and followed for 1 year. The primary endpoint was days lost due to unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization or due to death of any cause. This post-hoc analysis included 707 HF patients with diabetes.

Results: In HF patients with diabetes, RPM reduced the percentage of days lost due to cardiovascular hospitalization or death compared with usual care (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90), and the rate of all-cause mortality alone (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.85). RPM was also associated with an improvement in quality of life (mean difference in change in global score of Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score (MLHFQ): - 3.4, 95% CI - 6.2 to - 0.6).

Conclusion: These results support the use of RPM in HF patients with diabetes.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01878630.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11170842PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02285-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients diabetes
16
heart failure
12
tim-hf2 study
12
days lost
12
diabetes post-hoc
8
analysis tim-hf2
8
reduced percentage
8
percentage days
8
lost unplanned
8
unplanned cardiovascular
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!