Impact of three different peak picking software tools on the quality of untargeted metabolomics data.

Data quality and control parameters are becoming more important in metabolomics. For peak picking, open-source or commercial solutions are used. Other publications consider different software solutions or data acquisition types for peak picking, a combination, including proposed and new quality parameters for the process of peak picking, does not exist. This study tries to examine the performance of three different software in terms of reproducibility and quality of their output while also considering new quality parameters to gain a better understanding of resulting feature lists in metabolomics data. We saw best recovery of spiked analytes in MS-DIAL. Reproducibility over multiple projects was good among all software. The total number of features found was consistent for DDA and full scan acquisition in MS-DIAL but full scan data leading to considerably more features in MZmine and Progenesis Qi. Feature linearity proved to be a good quality parameter. Features in MS-DIAL and MZmine, showed good linearity while Progenesis Qi produced large variation, especially in full scan data. Peak width proved to be a very powerful filtering criteria revealing many features in MZmine and Progenesis Qi to be of questionable peak width. Additionally, full scan data appears to produce a disproportionally higher number of short features. This parameter is not yet available in MS-DIAL. Finally, the manual classification of true positive features proved MS-DIAL to perform significantly better in DDA data (62 % true positive) than the two other software in either mode. We showed that currently popular solutions MS-DIAL and MZmine perform well in targeted analysis of spiked analytes as well as in classic untargeted analysis. The commercially available solution Progenesis Qi does not hold any advantage over the two in terms of quality parameters, of which we proposed peak width as a new parameter and showed that already proposed parameters such as feature linearity in samples of increasing concentration are advisable to use.