AI Article Synopsis

  • The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a new trial design called time to exceed prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC), which aims to minimize participant exposure to placebos in epilepsy trials.
  • Using this design, researchers analyzed treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from a trial on the drug perampanel for seizures.
  • The results indicated that nearly all TEAEs occurred before the T-PSC cutoff, showing that the trial design can effectively replicate safety conclusions, with fewer adverse events reported for the perampanel treatment compared to placebo.

Article Abstract

Objective: Static assignment of participants in randomized clinical trials to placebo or ineffective treatment confers risk from continued seizures. An alternative trial design of time to exceed prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC) has replicated the efficacy conclusions of traditionally designed trials, with shorter exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Trials aim to evaluate efficacy as well as safety and tolerability; therefore, we evaluated whether this T-PSC design also could replicate the trial's safety and tolerability conclusions.

Methods: We retrospectively applied the T-PSC design to analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from a blinded, placebo-controlled trial of perampanel for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (NCT01393743). The safety analysis set consisted of 81 and 82 participants randomized to perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs of special interest that occurred before T-PSC relative to those observed during the full-length trial.

Results: Of the 67 and 59 participants who experienced TEAEs in the perampanel and placebo arms during full-length trial, 66 (99%) and 54 (92%) participants experienced TEAEs with onset occurring before T-PSC, respectively. When limited to treatment-related TEAEs, 55 of 56 (98%) and 32 of 37 (86%) participants reported treatment-related TEAEs that occurred before T-PSC in the perampanel and placebo arms, respectively. There were more TEAEs after T-PSC with placebo as compared to perampanel (Fisher exact odds ratio = 8.6, p = .035), which resulted in overestimation of the difference in TEAE rate. There was a numerical reduction in serious TEAEs (3/13 occurred after T-PSC, one in placebo and two in perampanel).

Significance: Almost all TEAEs occurred before T-PSC. More treatment-related TEAEs occurred after T-PSC for participants randomized to placebo than perampanel, which may be due to either a shorter T-PSC or delayed time to TEAE for placebo.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325753PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.18023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

occurred t-psc
20
treatment-related teaes
16
teaes
13
safety tolerability
12
participants randomized
12
perampanel placebo
12
placebo arms
12
teaes occurred
12
t-psc
11
placebo
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!