Objectives: Olfactory training (OT) has emerged as a first-line therapeutic approach to the management of olfactory dysfunction. Conventional OT (COT) involves the systematic home-based exposure to four distinct odors. Previous research has demonstrated that immersive OT (IOT) involving full-body exposure to dozens of distinct odors could also improve overall olfactory function. This study compared IOT and COT in terms of efficacy.
Methods: A total of 60 patients were enrolled and assigned to three groups. The IOT group ( = 25) underwent immersive exposure to 64 odors once daily in a specialized theater. COT participants ( = 17) sniffed four typical odors in a set of four jars twice daily at home. A control group ( = 18) underwent passive observation. Olfactory function was assessed before and after training.
Results: Significant improvements in composite threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) scores were observed after training in both the IOT (mean difference = 2.5 ± 1.1. = .030) and COT (mean difference = 4.2 ± 1.3, = .002) groups. No changes were observed in the control group. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the COT group (41%) presented improvements of clinical importance (TDI ≥5.5) compared to the controls ( = .018). The improvements attained in the IOT group (20%) were less pronounced ( = .38).
Conclusion: While IOT did not exhibit the same efficacy as COT in restoring olfactory function, it still demonstrated promising outcomes. Future efforts to advance olfactory recovery should focus on cross-modal integration.
Level Of Evidence: Level 3.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166096 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1270 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!