AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored variations in muscle mass (MM) and bone mass (BM) measurements among recreational strength trainees using different formulas, revealing significant differences in the estimates.
  • Findings indicated strong agreement between certain MM formulas (Kerr, Lee, and Poortmans) in the general population, but this consistency diminished when analyzed by sex, particularly for females.
  • The research concluded that disparities exist in MM and BM estimations, with sex being a key factor, emphasizing the need for caution when comparing individual results to reference standards or other studies.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The interest in estimating muscle mass (MM) and bone mass (BM) has grown in the sporting arena, and more specifically in recreational strength trainees, leading to the creation of different strategies to assess them. The aims were: 1) to investigate the agreement between different MM and BM formulas, and the muscle-bone index (MBI), and to establish the differences between them, in a healthy young adult population; and 2) to analyze if there are differences between males and females in the comparison of MM, BM and MBI formulas.

Methods: This study followed a descriptive cross-sectional design. A total of 130 adult active recreational strength trainees were evaluated according to the procedures described by the International Society for the Advancement in Kinanthropometry (ISAK). Estimations were made in kilograms of MM and BM by following the equations by different authors.

Results: The results showed significant differences between the values obtained by all the MM and BM formulas in the general sample ( < 0.001), and by the majority of formulas for male and female samples. In the general sample, Lin's coefficient indicated a strong agreement between Kerr, Lee, and Poortmans' MM estimation equations (concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) = 0.96-0.97). However, when stratifying by sex, this agreement persisted only in males (CCC = 0.90-0.94), in contrast with a lack of agreement observed in females (CCC < 0.90). Discrepancies in bone mass agreement were noted both in the general sample (CCC < 0.15) and when stratified by sex (CCC < 0.12).

Conclusions: In general, differences were found between the values reported by the MM and BM formulas in recreational strength trainees, without an agreement between them. Sex was shown to significantly influence the differences found. The practical implications are that when comparing an individual with reference tables, other studies, or if analyzing an individual's evolution, the same estimation equation should be used, as they are not interchangeable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164060PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17506DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

recreational strength
16
strength trainees
16
bone mass
12
general sample
12
estimating muscle
8
differences values
8
agreement
7
differences
5
ccc
5
agreement differences
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!