Introduction Academic coaching fosters self-directed learning and is growing in popularity within residency programs. Implementation is often limited by available faculty time and funding. Peer coaching is an emerging alternative but is not well studied. This study aims to demonstrate the acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of a resident peer coaching program. Methodology In the 2021-2022 academic year, within a large pediatric residency program, we selected and trained senior residents as coaches and interns who opted in as coachees. Coaching dyads began meeting in the fall and worked toward individualized goals throughout the year; control interns participated in routine didactics. Outcomes included Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestone scores and a self-assessment survey (SAS). Results We enrolled 15/42 (36%) interns as coachees, with the remaining 27 (64%) as controls. Narrative feedback from coaches and coachees was overall positive, and time commitment was feasible for program staff (10-12 hours/month), coaches (three to four hours/month), and coachees (one to two hours/month) with minimal financial needs. Post-intervention, more coachees than controls scored ≥4.0 on ACGME milestones systems-based practice 3 (SBP3; 3/15, 20%, vs. 2/27, 7%), SBP4 (4/15, 27%, vs. 5/27, 19%), and practice-based learning and improvement 1 (4/15, 27%, vs. 3/27, 11%). SAS response rate was 8/15 (53%) for coachees and 5/27 (19%) for controls. More coachees than controls reported baseline difficulty with time management (3/8, 38%, vs. 1/5, 20%); only coachees improved post-intervention, with 0/8 (0%) having difficulty versus 2/5 (40%) of controls. Conclusions Resident peer coaching is acceptable and feasible to implement. Coachees reported more improvement in time management than controls, and ACGME milestone scores suggest improved use of evidence-based medicine and interprofessional care coordination among coachees.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11156810 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59846 | DOI Listing |
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm
March 2025
University of Iowa, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, 180 S Grand Avenue 339 CPB, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States of America.
Objectives: To implement the Cardiovascular Practice Transformation (CPT) program and evaluate its impact on blood pressure, and to assess the feasibility of implementing the CPT program by identifying obstacles and facilitators.
Methods: Twenty-three Iowa pharmacies participated in the program, each monitoring approximately 10 hypertensive patients for 6 months. Pharmacists assessed blood pressure, medication adherence and addressed medication-related problems during patient visits.
Arch Public Health
January 2025
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical-Surgical Nursing Department,, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Background: ENABLE (Educate, Nurture, Advise, Before Life Ends) is a model of nurse-led, early palliative care that was originally developed for U.S. patients with advanced cancer and their family caregivers and then adapted for patients with heart failure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLOS Glob Public Health
January 2025
Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
High-quality health systems are key to improving population health outcomes globally. In India, the National Quality Assurance Standards (NQAS) is a certification policy adopted by the government to improve the quality of care in public health facilities. This policy aims to assess public health facilities through a set of comprehensive, pre-defined standards derived from global best practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Endocr Soc
January 2025
Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
J Med Educ Curric Dev
January 2025
Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Objectives: Instilling the principles of ethical and responsible medical research is critical for educating the next generation of clinical researchers. We developed a responsible conduct of research (RCR) workshop and associated curriculum for undergraduate trainees in a quantitative clinical research program.
Methods: Topics in this 7-module RCR workshop are relevant to undergraduate trainees in quantitative fields, many of whom are learning about these concepts for the first time.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!