A simple accurate method for concentration-QTc analysis in preclinical animal models.

J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods

Michigan State University, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, East Lansing, MI, USA. Electronic address:

Published: July 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • In cardiovascular safety studies, researchers focus on the QTc interval to predict changes that may occur in clinical settings, but nonclinical PK data limitations pose a challenge.
  • The study involved non-human primates and canines to analyze the relationship between average drug plasma concentration and QTc changes, using statistical methods to establish this correlation.
  • Results showed significant QTc changes in both species at specific concentrations of moxifloxacin, indicating that this method of averaging data can effectively model concentration-QTc relationships despite the lack of simultaneous data.

Article Abstract

Introduction: In preclinical cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies, statistical analysis of the rate corrected QT interval (QTc) is the focus for predicting QTc interval changes in the clinic. Modeling of a concentration/QTc relationship, common clinically, is limited due to minimal pharmacokinetic (PK) data in nonclinical testing. It is possible, however, to relate the average drug plasma concentration from sparse PK samples over specific times to the mean corrected QTc. We hypothesize that averaging drug plasma concentration and the QTc-rate relationship over time provides a simple, accurate concentration-QTc relationship bridging statistical and concentration/QTc modeling.

Methods: Cardiovascular telemetry studies were conducted in non-human primates (NHP; n = 48) and canines (n = 8). Pharmacokinetic samples were collected on separate study days in both species. Average plasma concentrations for specific intervals (CAverage) were calculated for moxifloxacin in canines and NHP using times corresponding to super-intervals for the QTc data statistical analysis. The QTc effect was calculated for each super-interval using a linear regression correction incorporating QT and HR data from the whole super-interval. The concentration QTc effects were then modeled.

Results: In NHP, a 10.9 ± 0.06 ms (mean ± 95% CI) change in QTc was detected at approximately 1.5× the moxifloxacin plasma concentration that causes a 10 ms QTc change in humans, based on a 0-24 h super-interval. When simulating a drug without QT effects, mock, no effect on QTc was detected at up to 3× the clinical concentration. Similarly, in canines, a 16.6 ± 0.1 ms change was detected at 1.7× critical clinical moxifloxacin concentration, and a 0.04 ± 0.1 ms change was seen for mock.

Conclusions: While simultaneous PK and QTc data points are preferred, practical constraints and the need for QTc averaging did not prevent concentration-QTc analyses. Utilizing a 0-24 h super-interval method illustrates a simple and effective method to address cardiovascular questions when preclinical drug exposures exceed clinical concentrations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2024.107528DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

plasma concentration
12
qtc
11
simple accurate
8
statistical analysis
8
drug plasma
8
qtc data
8
qtc detected
8
0-24 h super-interval
8
concentration
6
accurate method
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!