Comparison of whole-blood sirolimus concentrations measured by EMIT-based Siemens Viva-ProE® System and LC-MS/MS in Chinese transplant patients.

J Pharm Biomed Anal

Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, People's Republic of China; The School of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, People's Republic of China. Electronic address:

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Sirolimus (SRL) is vital for preventing organ rejection in transplant patients, and regular therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to ensure its effectiveness and safety.
  • The study compares the accuracy of SRL concentration measurements between the updated EMIT-based Viva-E® System (SVPS) and the established liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method, finding that SVPS values were significantly higher.
  • The research highlights the need to clearly indicate the measurement methods in therapeutic drug monitoring reports and provides conversion formulas for clinical centers to ensure consistency in SRL monitoring.

Article Abstract

Sirolimus (SRL) is commonly used in transplant patients to prevent organ transplant rejection. The current guidelines recommend to perform SRL therapeutic drug monitoring regularly to improve treatment outcomes and avoid adverse effects. Consequently, a precise and accurate method for determining SRL is crucial in clinical practice. Currently, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and immunoassays have been widely adopted for determining SRL concentrations. However, previous studies have shown that immunoassays exhibit a positive bias compared to LC-MS/MS. As the new updated version of the EMIT-based Viva-E® System (SVPS), this study aims to compare SRL blood concentrations measured by the SVPS and LC-MS/MS. The residual whole-blood samples obtained from transplant patients were simultaneously analyzed using the SVPS and LC-MS/MS, respectively. The correlation between the two assays was analyzed using the linear regression analysis and Deming linear regression. The Pearson correlation coefficient and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis were executed. The Paired Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to assess the concordance between the two methods. The SVPS considerably increased SRL concentration value by 46.62 % as compared to the LC-MS/MS method. When SRL concentrations measured by the SVPS were above 4.0 ng/mL, there was no significant difference between the corrected SVPS concentrations after using the Deming linear regression equation, indicating their interchangeability. Given the significant disparities observed between EMIT and LC-MS/MS, it is crucial to indicate the methodology and instruments in both TDM reports and future clinical guidelines. Our study also provides the conversion formulas between the SVPS and LC-MS/MS, which can be applied as a reference for different clinical centers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116271DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

concentrations measured
12
transplant patients
12
svps lc-ms/ms
12
linear regression
12
lc-ms/ms
8
determining srl
8
srl concentrations
8
compared lc-ms/ms
8
measured svps
8
deming linear
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!