Background: Distinctive differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been observed by race and ethnicity. We aim to (1) assess how often race and ethnicity were reported in clinical trials registered on , (2) evaluate whether the population was diverse enough, and (3) compare with publications.

Methods: We included phase 3 clinical trials registered with results on between 2007 and 2023. When race and/or ethnicity were reported, we searched for the corresponding publications.

Results: Out of the 99 included studies, 56% reported race and/or ethnicity, of which only 26% of those primarily completed before 2017. Studies reporting race or ethnicity contributed to a total of 33,891 participants, mainly enrolled in Eastern Europe. Most were White (93%), and the median percentage of White participants was 93% (interquartile range (IQR) = 86%-98%), compared to 3% for Black (IQR = 1%-12%) and 0.2% for Asian (IQR = 0%-1%). Four trials omitted race and ethnicity in publications and even when information was reported, some discrepancies in terminology were identified and categories with fewer participants were often collapsed.

Conclusion: More efforts should be done to improve transparency, accuracy, and representativeness, in publications and at a design phase, by addressing social determinants of health that historically limit the enrollment of underrepresented population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585241254283DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

race ethnicity
20
clinical trials
12
multiple sclerosis
8
phase clinical
8
ethnicity reported
8
trials registered
8
race and/or
8
and/or ethnicity
8
race
7
ethnicity
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!