Background: Distinctive differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) have been observed by race and ethnicity. We aim to (1) assess how often race and ethnicity were reported in clinical trials registered on , (2) evaluate whether the population was diverse enough, and (3) compare with publications.
Methods: We included phase 3 clinical trials registered with results on between 2007 and 2023. When race and/or ethnicity were reported, we searched for the corresponding publications.
Results: Out of the 99 included studies, 56% reported race and/or ethnicity, of which only 26% of those primarily completed before 2017. Studies reporting race or ethnicity contributed to a total of 33,891 participants, mainly enrolled in Eastern Europe. Most were White (93%), and the median percentage of White participants was 93% (interquartile range (IQR) = 86%-98%), compared to 3% for Black (IQR = 1%-12%) and 0.2% for Asian (IQR = 0%-1%). Four trials omitted race and ethnicity in publications and even when information was reported, some discrepancies in terminology were identified and categories with fewer participants were often collapsed.
Conclusion: More efforts should be done to improve transparency, accuracy, and representativeness, in publications and at a design phase, by addressing social determinants of health that historically limit the enrollment of underrepresented population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13524585241254283 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!