A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endoscopic resection for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center feasibility study. | LitMetric

Endoscopic resection for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multi-center feasibility study.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol

Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, 150 Jimo Road, Shanghai 200120, China.

Published: June 2024

Background: Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs) are highly uncommon and have not been thoroughly examined.

Objectives: The objective of this multi-center study was to assess the viability of endoscopic resection (ER) in the treatment of E-GISTs and to explore its clinical implications.

Design: This was a multi-center retrospective study. Consecutive patients referred to the four participating centers.

Methods: E-GISTs among the consecutive subepithelial tumors (SETs) treated by ER methods were enrolled from April 2019 to August 2022. Clinicopathological, endoscopic, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 23 patients with E-GISTs were included for analysis, accounting for 1.9% of all the esophageal SETs (1243 patients). The average size of the tumor lesions was 2.3 cm (range 1.0-4.0 cm). We observed that tumors larger than 2.0 cm were more likely to grow deeper, with a statistically significant difference ( < 0.001). resection was achieved in all 23 patients. The mean operation time was 53.6 min (range 25-111 min). One patient experienced significant intraoperative bleeding, which was promptly managed endoscopically without necessitating surgery. The average hospital stay was 4.5 days (range 3-8 days). The overall median follow-up period was 31 months (range 13-47 months). No tumor recurrence, residual tumor, distal metastasis, or death was observed during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: Based on our limited data, our study indicates that ER may be a feasible and effective option for treating esophageal GISTs measuring 4 cm or less. We suggest submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection as the preferred approach, as all E-GISTs in our study were situated in the muscularis propria layer. Additionally, tumors larger than 2 cm were more prone to deeper growth or extraluminal extension.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11155357PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848241255304DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endoscopic resection
8
esophageal gastrointestinal
8
gastrointestinal stromal
8
stromal tumors
8
resection esophageal
4
tumors
4
tumors multi-center
4
multi-center feasibility
4
feasibility study
4
study background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!