Background: In young adults, there is evidence that free arm movements do not help to compensate muscle fatigue-induced deteriorations in dynamic balance performance. However, the postural control system in youth is immature, and as a result, the use of arm movements may provide a compensatory "upper body strategy" to correct fatigue-related balance impairments. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of free vs. restricted arm movement on dynamic balance performance prior and following exercise-induced muscle fatigue.

Methods: Forty-three healthy youth (19 females; mean age: 12.8 ± 1.9 years) performed the Y Balance Test-Lower Quarter before and immediately after a fatiguing exercise (i.e., repetitive vertical bipedal box jumps until failure) using two different arm positions: free (move the arms freely) and restricted (keep the arms akimbo) arm movement.

Results: Muscle fatigue ( ≤ 0.033; 0.10 ≤   ≤ 0.33) and restriction of arm movement ( ≤ 0.005; 0.17 ≤   ≤ 0.46) resulted in significantly deteriorated dynamic balance performance. However, the interactions between the two did not reach the level of significance ( ≥ 0.091; 0.01 ≤   ≤ 0.07).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the use of an "upper body strategy" (i.e., free arm position) has no compensatory effect on muscle fatigue-induced dynamic balance deteriorations in healthy youth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153706PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1391868DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dynamic balance
20
arm movement
12
healthy youth
12
balance performance
12
muscle fatigue
8
free arm
8
arm movements
8
muscle fatigue-induced
8
"upper body
8
body strategy"
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!