AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to analyze the relationship between the Siewert classification of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas and their genomic profiles to better inform staging and treatment decisions.
  • The research included 350 patients and found that Siewert type I and II tumors displayed similar genomic features to lower esophageal tumors, while Siewert type III tumors had distinct characteristics more aligned with gastric cancers.
  • The findings suggest that molecular classification may be more beneficial than traditional anatomical classification for guiding treatment and improving prognosis in these cancer cases.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate how the Siewert classification of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas correlates with genomic profiles.

Summary/background Data: Current staging and treatment guidelines recommend that tumors with an epicenter less than 2 cm into the gastric cardia be treated as esophageal cancers, while tumors with epicenter greater than 2 cm into the cardia be staged and treated as gastric cancers. To date, however, few studies have compared the genomic profiles of the 3 Siewert classification groups to validate this distinction.

Methods: Using targeted tumor sequencing data on patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction previously treated with surgery at our institution, we compared genomic features across Siewert classification groups.

Results: A total of 350 patients were included: 121 had Siewert type I, 170 type II, and 59 type III. Comparisons by Siewert location revealed that Siewert type I and II were primarily characterized as the chromosomal instability (CIN) molecular subtype and displayed Barrett's metaplasia and p53 and cell cycle pathway dysregulation. Siewert type III tumors, by contrast, were more heterogeneous, including higher proportions of microsatellite instability (MSI) and genomically stable (GS) tumors and more frequently displayed ARID1A and somatic CDH1 alterations, signet ring cell features, and poor differentiation. Overall, Siewert type I and II tumors demonstrated greater genomic overlap with lower esophageal tumors, while Siewert type III tumors shared genomic features with gastric tumors.

Conclusions: Overall, our results support recent updates in treatment and staging guidelines. Ultimately, however, molecular rather than anatomic classification may prove more valuable in determining staging, treatment, and prognosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621229PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006363DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

siewert type
20
siewert classification
16
gastroesophageal junction
12
type iii
12
siewert
10
staging treatment
8
tumors epicenter
8
compared genomic
8
genomic features
8
iii tumors
8

Similar Publications

VGLL-fusions define a new class of intraparenchymal CNS schwannoma.

Neuro Oncol

December 2024

Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Neuropathologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Background: Intracerebral schwannomas are rare tumors resembling their peripheral nerve sheath counterparts but localized in the CNS. They are not classified as a separate tumor type in the 2021 WHO classification. This study aimed to compile and characterize these rare neoplasms morphologically and molecularly.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: To detect the risk factors associated with esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) after total gastrectomy for gastric and Siewert type II/III esophagogastric cancer.

Methods: The data for 609 patients underwent Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy between March 2015 and March 2021 were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tubular anastomosis is commonly used in proximal gastrectomy; however, its use in stage II esophagogastric conjugate cancer is currently unclear. In this study, we investigated the short- and long-term clinical outcomes of Siewert II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction after modified proximal gastrectomy with tubular esophagogastric anastomosis compared with total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Methods: We collected the clinical data of patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy tubular esophagogastric anastomosis (PG-TEA) and total gastrectomy Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TG-RY) from October 2015 to October 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In recent years, with the popularization of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic transphrenic approach (LTP) surgery for Siewert Type II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) has gradually been applied in clinical practice. This technique combines the advantages of transthoracic and transabdominal approaches, achieving a combined operation of the thoracic and abdominal cavities. It can achieve thorough lymph node dissection, safe esophageal resection margin, and reliable digestive tract reconstruction, and has promising application prospects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The incidence of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma has increased worldwide. As the EGJ is located at the boundary between the thoracic and abdominal cavities, the optimal surgical approach is a subject of debate and estimation of the esophageal invasion length (EIL) is an important factor in its selection.

Methods: Data from our in-house database were extracted for consecutive patients with Siewert type I, II and III EGJ adenocarcinoma (EIL ≤ 4 cm), who underwent transhiatal or transthoracic surgical resection between 2010 and 2016.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!