Developing a core outcome set for acetabular fractures: a systematic review protocol.

Syst Rev

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Published: June 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • This text discusses the variability in reported outcomes and measurements from clinical trials on acetabular fractures, highlighting the need for standardization to improve treatment knowledge and patient care.
  • The systematic review aims to identify and categorize the outcomes from studies on surgically treated acetabular fractures to develop a core set of relevant outcome measures for future research.
  • It acknowledges the challenges of including a wide range of study definitions and notes that only previously reported outcomes can be detected, potentially missing new relevant outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Clinical trials investigating acetabular fractures are heterogeneous in their investigated outcomes and their corresponding measurements. Standardization may facilitate comparability and pooling of research results, which would lead to an increase in knowledge about the optimal treatment of acetabular fractures, resulting in long-term evidence-based treatment decisions and improvements in patient care. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the reported outcomes and their measurements from studies on treatments for acetabular fractures to develop a core outcome set which contains the most relevant outcome measures to be included in future studies.

Methods: Studies published in English and German including patients aged 16 years and older, with a surgically treated acetabular fracture, will be included. Studies with nonsurgical treatment, pathologic fractures, polytraumatized patients, and patients younger than 16 years of age will be excluded because other outcomes may be of interest in these cases. Any prospective and retrospective study will be included. Systematic reviews will be excluded, but their included studies will be screened for eligibility. The literature will be searched on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. Risk of selective reporting of outcomes will be assessed using the Outcome Reporting Bias in Trials classification system. Heterogeneously defined outcomes that measure the same outcome will be grouped and subsequently categorized into outcome domains using the taxonomy of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative.

Discussion: It is expected that a high number of studies will be included, and many outcomes will be identified using different definitions and measurement instruments. A limitation of this systematic review is that only previously investigated outcomes will be detected, thus disregarding potentially relevant outcomes.

Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022357644.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11151679PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02571-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acetabular fractures
16
core outcome
12
systematic review
12
will included
12
outcomes will
12
will
11
outcome set
8
investigated outcomes
8
outcome measures
8
included studies
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!