AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared how two different blood flow restriction (BFR) devices, SmartCuffs and Hokanson, affected physiological and perceptual responses during resistance exercise.
  • When using a lower BFR level (40% limb occlusion pressure), no significant differences in blood pressure, muscle thickness, or strength were found between the devices, although perceived exertion and discomfort varied by set.
  • With a higher BFR level (80% limb occlusion pressure), perceptions of discomfort and exertion differed between the devices after multiple sets, with SmartCuffs allowing more repetitions to be completed than Hokanson in later sets.

Article Abstract

. To compare the acute physiological and perceptual responses to blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise using a traditional research device or novel, automated system.. Forty-four resistance trained individuals performed four sets of unilateral elbow flexion exercise (30% one-repetition maximum) to volitional failure using two distinct restrictive devices [SmartCuffs PRO BFR Model (SMARTCUFF), Hokanson E20 Rapid Inflation device (HOKANSON)] and with two levels of BFR [40% limb occlusion pressure (LOP), 80% LOP]. Blood pressure (BP), muscle thickness (MT), and isometric strength (ISO) were assessed prior to and following exercise. Perceptual responses [ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), discomfort] were assessed prior to exercise and following each exercise set.. Data are displayed as means (SD). Immediately following exercise with 40% LOP, there were no statistical differences between devices for BP, MT, and ISO. However, only following Set 1 of exercise, RPE was greater with SMARTCUFF compared to HOKANSON (< 0.05). In addition, only following Set 2 of exercise, discomfort was greater with HOKANSON compared to SMARTCUFF (< 0.001). Immediately following exercise with 80% LOP, there were no statistical differences between devices for BP, MT, and ISO. However, only following Set 4 of exercise, RPE was greater with HOKANSON compared to SMARTCUFF (< 0.05). In addition, following all exercise sets, discomfort was greater with HOKANSON compared to SMARTCUFF (< 0.001). For repetitions completed with 40% LOP there were no statistical differences between SMARTCUFF and HOKANSON across any exercise sets. For repetitions completed with 80% LOP there were no statistical differences between SMARTCUFF and HOKANSON across Set 1 of exercise (= 0.34), however, for Sets 2-4 of exercise, significantly greater number of repetitions were completed during SMARTCUFF than HOKANSON.. The present study provides valuable insight into the efficacy of a novel, automated BFR system (SMARTCUFF) eliciting comparable acute physiological responses to BFR exercise and in some cases favorable perceptual responses when compared to a traditional research device (HOKANSON).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad548cDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perceptual responses
16
exercise
16
smartcuff hokanson
16
lop statistical
16
statistical differences
16
set exercise
16
acute physiological
12
traditional device
12
novel automated
12
greater hokanson
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!