Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Carboxyamidotriazole (CAI) was previously recognized as a well-tolerated anticancer drug. It has also demonstrated significant anti-inflammatory effects in various cell and animal model experiments, prompting its investigation as a potential treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. In this study, the potential biotransformation metabolites of CAI were identified both in vitro and in vivo. A sensitive, specific, and accurate LC-MS method was developed for the quantitative analysis of CAI and its major metabolite, CAI-OH, in rat plasma. CAI, CAI-OH, and telmisartan (used as an internal standard) were separated using a Zorbax SB C column. The mobile phase consisted of water (phase A, containing 0.1% formic acid) and acetonitrile (phase B, containing 0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min. The analytes were examined using a high-resolution mass spectrometer, with detected mass-to-charge ratios of m/z 424.01293 for CAI, m/z 440.00785 for CAI-OH, and m/z 515.24415 for telmisartan. Good linearity was observed within the range of 10-5000 ng/mL. Both inter- and intra-batch precision (relative standard deviation, %) were below 6%, and the accuracy ranged from 94.9% to 106.1%. The analytes remained stable throughout the entire experimental period. This method was successfully applied in a pharmacokinetic study of CAI following oral administration in rats.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmc.5923 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!