A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Minimizing Incision in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Initial Experience and Comparative Analysis of Upper Midline Incision in 115 Recipients. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using an upper midline incision (UMI) shows advantages over the traditional J-shaped incision, including shorter recovery times and fewer complications.
  • A study comparing 115 UMI recipients to 140 J-shaped incision recipients found significant differences in ambulation time, ICU stay, and lower rates of pleural effusion and postoperative ileus.
  • Overall, UMI-LDLT is considered a safe and effective technique, providing similar long-term outcomes with less post-operative discomfort and complications.

Article Abstract

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) needs "Mercedes Benz" or "J-shaped" incision, causing short and long-term complications. An upper midline incision (UMI) is less invasive alternative but technically challenging. Reporting UMI for recipients in LDLT vs. conventional J-shaped incision. Retrospective analysis, July 2021 to December 2022. Peri-operative details and post-transplant outcomes of 115 consecutive adult LDLT recipients transplanted with UMI compared with 140 recipients with J-shaped incision. Cohorts had similar preoperative and intraoperative variables. The UMI group had significant shorter time to ambulation (3 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 1.3 days, = 0.001), ICU stay (3.8 ± 1.3 vs. 4.4 ± 1.5 days, = 0.001), but a similar hospital stay (15.6±7.6 vs. 16.1±10.9 days, = 0.677), lower incidence of pleural effusion (11.3% vs. 27.1% = 0.002), and post-operative ileus (1.7% vs. 9.3% = 0.011). The rates of graft dysfunction (4.3% vs. 8.5% = 0.412), biliary complications (6.1% vs. 12.1% = 0.099), 90-day mortality (7.8% vs. 12.1% = 0.598) were similar. UMI-LDLT afforded benefits such as reduced pleuropulmonary complications, better early post-operative recovery and reduction in scar-related complaints in the medium-term. This is a safe, non-inferior and reproducible technique for LDLT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11148218PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12536DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

living donor
8
donor liver
8
liver transplantation
8
upper midline
8
midline incision
8
j-shaped incision
8
incision
5
minimizing incision
4
incision living
4
transplantation initial
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!