Methamphetamine Use Disorder (MUD) is associated with substantially reduced quality of life. Yet, decisions to use persist, due in part to avoidance of anticipated withdrawal states. However, the specific cognitive mechanisms underlying this decision process, and possible modulatory effects of aversive states, remain unclear. Here, 56 individuals with MUD and 58 healthy comparisons (HCs) performed a decision task, both with and without an aversive interoceptive state induction. Computational modeling measured the tendency to test beliefs about uncertain outcomes (directed exploration) and the ability to update beliefs in response to outcomes (learning rates). Compared to HCs, those with MUD exhibited less directed exploration and slower learning rates, but these differences were not affected by aversive state induction. These results suggest novel, state-independent computational mechanisms whereby individuals with MUD may have difficulties in testing beliefs about the tolerability of abstinence and in adjusting behavior in response to consequences of continued use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11142260PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.17.24307491DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

directed exploration
12
learning rates
12
state induction
12
methamphetamine disorder
8
aversive interoceptive
8
interoceptive state
8
individuals mud
8
individuals methamphetamine
4
disorder reduced
4
reduced directed
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!