Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) remains a viable target for drug development since the discovery of the association of its mutations with Parkinson's disease (PD). G2019S (in the kinase domain) is the most common mutation for LRRK2-based PD. Though various types of inhibitors have been developed for the kinase domain to reduce the effect of the mutation, understanding the working of these inhibitors at the molecular level is still ongoing. This study focused on the exploration of the dissociation mechanism (pathways) of inhibitors from (WT and G2019S) LRRK2 kinase (using homology model CHK1 kinase), which is one of the crucial aspects in drug discovery. Here, two ATP-competitive type I inhibitors, PF-06447475 and MLi-2 (Comp1 and Comp2 ), and one non-ATP-competitive type II inhibitor, rebastinib (Comp3), were considered for this investigation. To study the unbinding process, random accelerated molecular dynamics simulations were performed. The binding free energies of the three inhibitors for different egression paths were determined using umbrella sampling. This work found four major egression pathways that were adopted by the inhibitors Comp1 (path1, path2, and path3), Comp2 (path1, path2 and path3), and Comp3 (path3 and path4). Also, the mechanism of unbinding for each path and key residues involved in unbinding were explored. Mutation was not observed to impact the preference of the particular egression pathways for both LRRK2-Comp1 and -Comp2 systems. However, the findings suggested that the size of the inhibitor molecules might have an effect on the preference of the egression pathways. The binding energy and residence time of the inhibitors followed a similar trend to experimental observations. The findings of this work might provide insight into designing more potent inhibitors for the G2019S LRRK2 kinase.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c00335 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!