A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Melting curve analysis reveals false-positive norovirus detection in a molecular syndromic panel. | LitMetric

Melting curve analysis reveals false-positive norovirus detection in a molecular syndromic panel.

J Clin Virol

Division of Medical Microbiology and Virology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Published: August 2024

Background: Molecular syndromic panels can improve rapidity of results and ease clinical laboratory workflow, although caution has been raised for potential false-positive results. Upon implementation of a new panel for infectious diarrhea (BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal [GI] Panel, bioMérieux) in our clinical laboratory, a higher than expected number of stool samples with norovirus were detected.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate positive percent agreement and the false-positive rate of norovirus detected by the multiplex BioFire GI panel compared to a singleplex commercial assay.

Study Design: From October 2023 to January 2024, all prospective stool samples with a positive norovirus result by BioFire had melting curves reviewed manually using the BioFire FilmArray Torch System. Stool samples further underwent testing by a supplementary real-time RT-PCR assay (Xpert® Norovirus, Cepheid) for comparative analysis.

Results: Of the 50 stool samples with norovirus detected by BioFire, 18 (36 %) tested negative by Xpert (deemed "false-positives"). Furthermore, melting curve analysis revealed nearly all of these samples had atypical melting curve morphologies for the "Noro-1" target on BioFire (16/18, 89 %), which was statistically significant (Odds Ratio 173.2, 95 % CI [22.2, 5326.9], p < 0.0001). Stool samples with multiple pathogens detected by BioFire including norovirus were not more likely to produce false-positive norovirus results (Odds Ratio 1, 95 % CI [0.3, 3.3], p = 1).

Conclusions: Although not described in the manufacturer's Instructions for Use, we propose routine manual review of melting curves for the BioFire GI panel prior to reporting, to mitigate potential false-positive norovirus results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105697DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stool samples
20
melting curve
12
false-positive norovirus
12
norovirus
9
curve analysis
8
molecular syndromic
8
clinical laboratory
8
potential false-positive
8
samples norovirus
8
norovirus detected
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!