AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of surgical approach (minimally invasive liver resection vs. open liver resection) on post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients, to determine if outcomes differ based on the technique used.
  • It finds that while major liver resections result in similar liver failure rates between both methods, patients undergoing minor hepatectomies show lower rates of complications with minimally invasive surgeries.
  • Key findings indicate that patients undergoing open liver resection for minor hepatectomies experience longer hospital stays, higher rates of complications like infections and organ failures, and increased likelihood of severe liver failure, suggesting that minimally invasive approaches are preferable for minimizing risks.

Article Abstract

The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach. Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure. A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; = .003), infection (.9% vs .1%; = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; = .03). A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00031348241246175DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

liver failure
16
cirrhotic patients
12
patients undergoing
12
minor hepatectomy
12
surgical approach
8
post-hepatectomy liver
8
minimally invasive
8
liver resection
8
phlf grade
8
hepatectomy group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!