AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the effectiveness of baricitinib and TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who did not respond to conventional treatments.
  • A total of 199 patients were randomized, showing baricitinib to be both non-inferior and superior in achieving meaningful clinical responses at 12 weeks, with a higher percentage of patients reaching specified disease activity targets compared to TNFi.
  • The results suggest that baricitinib may be a more effective initial treatment option than TNFi for RA patients who have failed previous therapies, based on the outcomes measured over 48 weeks.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a strategy administering baricitinib versus one using TNF-inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) failure in a real-life treat-to-target (T2T) setting.

Methods: Patients with biological and targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD) naïve RA with disease duration ≤5 years without contraindications to b/tsDMARD were randomised to either TNFi or baricitinib when csDMARD failed to achieve disease control in a T2T setting. Changes in clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at 12-week intervals for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority, with testing for superiority if non-inferiority is demonstrated, of baricitinib strategy in the number of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology 50 (ACR50) response at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included 28-joint count Disease Activity Score with C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) <2.6, changes in PROMs and radiographic progression.

Results: A total of 199 patients (TNFi, n=102; baricitinib, n=97) were studied. Both study groups were similar. Baricitinib was both non-inferior and superior in achieving ACR50 response at week 12 (42% vs 20%). Moreover, 75% of baricitinib patients achieved DAS28-CRP <2.6 at week 12 compared with 46% of TNFi patients. On secondary outcomes throughout the duration of the study, the baricitinib strategy demonstrated comparable or better outcomes than TNFi strategy. Although not powered for safety, no unexpected safety signals were seen in this relatively small group of patients.

Conclusion: Up to present, in a T2T setting, patients with RA failing csDMARDs have two main strategies to consider, Janus Kinases inhibitor versus bDMARDs (in clinical practice, predominantly TNFi). The PERFECTRA study suggested that starting with baricitinib was superior over TNFi in achieving response at 12 weeks and resulted in improved outcomes across all studied clinical measures and PROMs throughout the study duration in these patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328659PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004291DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

baricitinib versus
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
perfectra pragmatic
4
pragmatic multicentre
4
multicentre real-life
4
real-life study
4
study comparing
4
comparing treat-to-target
4
treat-to-target strategies
4
baricitinib
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!