Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Anemia in acute myocardial infarctions has been an area of curiosity, with studies looking into clinical outcomes of blood transfusions in this patient population for decades without consistent evidence in the literature pointing in the direction of liberal or conservative transfusion use. With the recent publication of the MINT (Restrictive or Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Myocardial Infarction) trial showing that the liberal transfusion strategy did not reduce the recurrent risk of myocardial infarction but that harm in restrictive strategies cannot be excluded, we look to other literature and trials with different endpoints, which indicate that the liberal transfusion strategies may cause more harm. In this review, we will discuss new evidence as compared to the old for the conservative use of blood transfusions in the setting of myocardial infarctions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000737 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!