Mechanical effect of changed femoral neck ante-version angles on the stability of an intertrochanteric fracture fixed with PFNA: A finite element analysis.

Objective: Change of femoral neck ante-version angle postoperatively due to inadequate reduction could result in unsatisfying treatment outcome of intertrochanteric fracture. However, the influence of increased or decreased femoral neck ante-version on the biomechanical stability of the bone-implant complex has rarely been studied.

Methods: A finite element model of a complete normal human femur with normal femoral neck ante-version as 13° was established accurately by scanning a 64 year old female femur. The models of 31-A1.1 intertrochanteric fractures with different femoral neck ante-version angles of 3°, 5.5°, 8°, 10.5°, 13°, 15.5°, 18°, 20.5°, 23° were created. They were assembled with a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) device. The biomechanical differences with varying femoral neck ante-version angles were compared using finite element analysis method.

Results: As the femoral neck ante-version angle gradually increased from 13° to 23°with a gradient of 2.5°, the peak von Mises stress was gradually increased from 137.82 MPa to 276.02 MPa. Similarly, the peak von Mises stress was gradually increased from 137.82 MPa to 360.12 MPa with the femoral neck ante-version angle decreased from 13° to 3°. When decreased ante-version angle of 7.5° and increased ante-version angle of 10° will exceed the yield strength of femoral (240.32 MPa), the risk of femoral fracture will increase significantly. The maximum displacement of the femur was significantly reduced for increased ante-version models than for decreased ante-version models, whether the changes of ante-version angles were 2.5°, 5°, 7.5° or 10°. he maximum stress of PFNA was found in the intersection of main nail and helical blade, and became greater gradually as the ante-version angle increased or decreased with a gradient of 2.5°. The maximum stress of PFNA was presented in the model 5.5° with the maximum stress of 724.42 MPa (near to the yield strength of titanium alloy of 700-1000 MPa), producing the breakage risk of PFNA. The maximum displacement of the PFNA was significantly reduced for increased ante-version models than for decreased ante-version models, whether the changes of ante-version angles were 2.5°, 5°, 7.5° or 10°.

Conclusion: Based on the results of present study, it was demonstrated that the anatomical reduction of femoral neck ante-version was vital to secure the optimal stability. Abnormal femoral ante-version could increase the potential risk of failure for intertrochanteric fracture after PFNA. The stability of increased femoral ante-version (less than 10°) was superior to the stability of decreased ante-version (less than 5°) for the cases of difficulty to acquire anatomical reduction. The clinical implication of the finding was that increased femoral neck ante-version had an advantage of mechanical stability towards the decreased femoral neck ante-version for the cases of comminuted intertrochanteric fracture and failure of anatomical reduction.