Insights into invasive fungal infection diagnostic and treatment capacities in tertiary care centres of Germany.

JAC Antimicrob Resist

Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Translational Research, Herderstraße 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany.

Published: June 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The rising rate of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in Germany poses a serious health issue, particularly for immunocompromised patients, and is complicated by diagnostic challenges and increasing antifungal resistance.
  • - A survey of 58 hospitals revealed that while many facilities have adequate diagnostic tools, there are significant differences in resources, particularly for high-risk patients, with specialized hospitals offering better access to necessary services.
  • - The study emphasizes the need for improved diagnostic and treatment practices for IFIs to enhance patient outcomes, highlighting the importance of ongoing research and collaboration in this field.

Article Abstract

Introduction: In Germany, the growing incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is a significant health concern, particularly impacting individuals with compromised immune systems due to factors like increasing transplant recipients, an ageing population, and heightened use of immunosuppressive medications. Diagnosing IFI remains challenging, and the integration of biomarker assays into clinical practice is difficult. Antifungal resistance, exemplified by pan-antifungal-resistant cases, adds complexity to treatment. This study aims to provide a concise overview of the diagnostic and treatment landscape for IFI in Germany, identifying areas for improvement and paving the way for targeted interventions.

Methods: Data were collected using an online electronic case report form from October 2021 to February 2023. The survey included questions about institutional practices related to fungal infection diagnosis and treatment, with invitations extended to researchers nationwide.

Results: The study surveyed 58 hospitals across Germany. Notably, 77.6% managed high-risk patients for IFI. While 86% had onsite microbiology labs, a significant difference was noted for high-risk patients (93% in specialized hospitals versus 62% in others). Microscopy services had 96% coverage, while overall access to culture was 96%. Antigen tests had 96% coverage, and antibody access was reported at 98%. PCR testing was available at 98%. Imaging access showed no significant access differences. Variability existed in amphotericin B formulations based on patient profiles. Therapeutic drug monitoring was more common in high-risk patient institutions (89.5% versus 50.0%). All analysed institutions reported access to surgery (100%).

Conclusions: Addressing identified disparities in diagnostic and therapeutic resources for IFI is crucial to improving patient outcomes. The study calls for ongoing research and collaboration to optimize strategies for the prevention and treatment of IFI, emphasizing the importance of equitable access to resources, especially in high-risk patient populations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11135635PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae083DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

invasive fungal
8
fungal infection
8
diagnostic treatment
8
high-risk patients
8
96% coverage
8
high-risk patient
8
access
6
treatment
5
ifi
5
insights invasive
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!