AI Article Synopsis

  • Oral anticoagulants (OACs) help prevent ischemic strokes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), but they can also raise the risk of major bleeding, especially in Japanese patients with limited existing data on this risk.
  • In a study analyzing 11,539 NVAF patients receiving OACs, major bleeding occurred in 1.3% of patients per year, with risk factors including advanced age, hypertension, prior bleeding, anemia, and the use of antiplatelet agents.
  • The researchers created a new risk stratification system called HED-[EPA]-B, which showed better predictive capability for major bleeding compared to existing scores like HAS-BLED and ATRIA, suggesting

Article Abstract

Aim: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) reduce the risk of ischemic stroke but may increase the risk of major bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Various risk scores, such as HAS-BLED, ATRIA, ORBIT, and DOAC, have been proposed to assess the risk of major bleeding in patients with NVAF receiving OACs. However, limited data are available regarding bleeding risk stratification in Japanese patients with NVAF.

Methods: Of the 16,098 NVAF patients from the J-RISK AF study, the combined data of the five major AF registries in Japan (J-RHYTHM Registry, Fushimi AF Registry, Shinken Database, Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies, and Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry), we analyzed 11,539 patients receiving OACs (median age, 71 years old; women, 29.6%; median CHADS-VASc score, 3).

Results: During the 2-year follow-up period, major bleeding occurred in 274 patients (1.3% per patient-year). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, an advanced age, hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 150 mmHg), bleeding history, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and concomitant antiplatelet agents were significantly associated with a higher incidence of major bleeding. We developed a novel risk stratification system, HED-[EPA]-B score, which had a better predictive performance for major bleeding (C-statistics 0.67, [95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.70]) than the HAS-BLED (0.64, [0.60-0.67], P for difference 0.02) and ATRIA (0.63, [0.60-0.66], P for difference <0.01) scores. Furthermore, it was non-significantly higher than the ORBIT (0.65, [0.62-0.68], P for difference 0.07) and DOAC (0.65, [0.62-0.68], P for difference 0.17) scores.

Conclusion: Our novel risk stratification system, the HED-[EPA]-B score, may be useful for identifying Japanese patients receiving OACs at a risk of major bleeding.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537787PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5551/jat.64842DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

major bleeding
28
novel risk
12
japanese patients
12
risk major
12
receiving oacs
12
risk stratification
12
bleeding
9
major
8
patients
8
patients non-valvular
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!