AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how two cervical precancer treatments, LEEP and thermal ablation, affect sexual function and overall recovery for women with cervical lesions.
  • Despite the effectiveness of both treatments at six months, thermal ablation was quicker and associated with less pain and better improvements in sexual function indicators like desire and satisfaction.
  • The results indicate a need for more focus on sexual health outcomes post-treatment in future research on cervical cancer prevention.

Article Abstract

Background: The prevention of cervical cancer can be achieved by treating high-grade cervical precancerous lesions. Treatment options for cervical precancer include excisional procedures, and ablation treatments. Despite the long pre-invasive course of the disease, literature addressing sexual function post-treatment for cervical pre-invasive lesions is scarce. This study aims to bridge this gap and assess the sexual function and the acceptability, efficacy, safety, and complications of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) versus thermal ablation.

Methods: The prospective open-label randomized controlled trial recruited women aged 22-55 with histologically confirmed Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 3 lesions. Participants were randomly allocated to either thermal ablation or LEEP. All cases were followed up with a Pap smear at three- and six-months post treatment. Sexual health assessments were conducted using a questionnaire at baseline and 3 months post-procedure. Secondary outcome measures included comparison of acceptability, pain, and side effects between the two treatment measures.

Results: Out of 1356 screened cases, 60 were included in the study and randomized in two groups. The groups had similar baseline characteristics. Duration of LEEP was longer than thermal ablation (25.33 vs. 20.67 minutes), with higher pain reported 10 minutes post-procedure in the LEEP group. Three months post-procedure, both groups showed comparable acceptability and symptom relief. Sexual function parameters significantly improved in the thermal ablation group compared to LEEP, including satisfaction, desire, lubrication, flexibility, and ability to reach climax.

Conclusion: LEEP and thermal ablation are effective treatments for CIN with similar efficacy at 6 months. Thermal ablation demonstrated advantages in procedure time and post-procedural pain but exhibited varying effects on sexual function, improving satisfaction and desire. In contrast, LEEP showed a decrease in satisfaction and potential alterations in lubrication and flexibility. Larger-sample, longer-term studies are recommended for further insights.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318812PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.5.1699DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thermal ablation
24
sexual function
20
loop electrosurgical
8
electrosurgical excision
8
excision procedure
8
leep
8
procedure leep
8
cervical intraepithelial
8
intraepithelial neoplasia
8
neoplasia cin
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!