Background: The impact of capsular closure vs non-closure in hip arthroscopy for femoracetabular impingement (FAI) was assessed by a meta-analysis.
Methods: With the most recent search update occurring in August 2022, relevant studies were found by searching the Pubmed and EMBASE databases. A collection of studies was made that conducted hip arthroscopy for FAI. Review Manager 5.3 was used to carry out the meta-analysis. The dichotomous and continuous factors were compared using the odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD). A fixed-effect or random-effect model was chosen, depending on the degree of heterogeneity (I). Forest plots were used to assess the results. A significance level of P < 0.05 was applied to the statistical analysis.
Results: Ultimately, 15 studies were incorporated into the meta-analysis. The surgery time was longer for the capsular closure group (CC group) compared to the non-closure (NC group) group. ( < 0.001, SMD = 8.59, 95%CI [7.40, 9.77], I = 32 %). Following hip arthroscopy, the CC group's mHHS was superior to that of the NC group ( = 0.001, MD = 2.05, 95%CI [0.83, 3.27], I = 42 %), HOS-ADL ( < 0.001, MD = 4.29, 95%CI [3.08, 5.50], I = 0 %). The capsular closure group had a reduced rate of postoperative complications ( = 0.001, OR = 0.21, 95%CI [0.08, 0.54], I = 0 %) and conversion to THA ( = 0.01, OR = 0.42, 95%CI [0.21, 0.83], I = 0 %) following hip arthroscopy than the non-closure group. The revision rate, VAS, and postoperative HOS-SSS did not significantly differ between these two groups (>0.05).
Conclusion: The current meta-analysis found that the closed group had a lower complication rate and considerably greater mHHS and HOS-ADL following surgery compared to the non-closed capsule group. Whether this is related to the continuous progress of biomechanical and clinical research techniques deserves our attention.
Level Of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I through Level III studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128904 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31088 | DOI Listing |
Orthopadie (Heidelb)
January 2025
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Background: Patients who have had prior injections, surgeries such as arthroscopies, and have existing osteosynthetic implants in the hip and knee have an increased risk of periprosthetic infections when undergoing hip (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Osteosynthesis: For patients with osteosynthetic implants in the knee joint, a two-stage procedure (implant removal followed by TKA) is recommended based on the available literature and the high colonization rates. A two-stage procedure is also recommended for patients with hip implants.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, 314001, China.
Background: The influence of femoroacetabular (FA) impingement has been implied in early hip osteoarthritis, particularly in young patients who enjoy athletics. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to assess the effectiveness and safety of hip arthroscopy compared to open surgical dislocation for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), based on clinical trials that have been published.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted through PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies evaluating coxoscopy and open surgical dislocation as treatment modalities for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI).
Arthroscopy
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519. Electronic address:
Purpose: To provide an aggregate review of literature on 1) outcomes related to the quality of intercourse (frequency, postoperative pain during intercourse, postoperative sexual dysfunction) after hip arthroscopy and 2) patient-reported outcomes regarding postoperative sexual function after hip arthroscopy.
Methods: This systematic review followed The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and Scopus were queried in March 2024.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
American Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, Illinois, USA.
Background: Sex has been associated with different pathologic characteristics in painful hips undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery.
Purpose: To compare minimum 10-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship in patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears according to sex.
Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Sports Health
January 2025
Section of Young Adult Hip Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Medical College of Rush University, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Background: Previous studies have identified demographic, radiographic, and intraoperative predictors of outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, yet few studies have identified whether preoperative gait metrics can predict outcomes.
Hypothesis: Increased preoperative step count, walking speed, step length, and gait symmetry will be associated with better outcomes after surgery.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!