A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis Criteria in Clinical Settings: Conventional vs. Neuropsychological. | LitMetric

Comparison of Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis Criteria in Clinical Settings: Conventional vs. Neuropsychological.

Alpha Psychiatry

Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Published: March 2024

Background: Theories on Alzheimer disease pathogenesis propose a gap between pathological changes and the onset of clinical symptoms. The early detection of cognitive decline is crucial for the implementation of preventive strategies. Mild cognitive impairment is a transitional stage and an accurate diagnosis is vital. However, the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment varies due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of comprehensive neuropsychological criteria, including all cognitive domains, for diagnosing cognitive impairment in clinical settings.

Methods: The study included 509 subjects with subjective cognitive complaints between 2017 and 2021. They were diagnosed using the conventional and neuropsychological criteria, and the results were named the complex criteria (conventional criteria-neuropsychological criteria).

Results: Concordance between the conventional and neuropsychological diagnostic criteria diagnoses was 87.82%. Some participants diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia using the conventional criteria were classified as normal according to the neuropsychological criteria. Notably, the mild cognitive impairment - normal cognition (MCI-NC) and dementia (DEM)-NC (normal cognition) groups exhibited distinct characteristics. The MCI-NC group had higher depression scores ( = .008) and better memory performance ( = .026) and executive function ( = .020) than the MCI-MCI group. The DEM-NC group had better instrumental activities of daily living ( < .001) than the DEM-DEM group.

Conclusion: This study highlights the complexity of diagnosing cognitive impairment and the importance of comprehensive criteria. Relying solely on conventional criteria may lead to overdiagnosis. The neuropsychological criteria consider various cognitive domains and better discriminate between individuals with MCIs or other factors that contribute to cognitive difficulties.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11117417PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231448DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cognitive impairment
28
mild cognitive
16
neuropsychological criteria
16
conventional neuropsychological
12
criteria
11
cognitive
11
diagnostic criteria
8
cognitive domains
8
diagnosing cognitive
8
conventional criteria
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!